As part of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Congress has imposed a requirement on providers making or receiving more than $5 million annually in Medicaid payments to implement an employee education program about the False Claims Act prohibitions and related whistleblower protections. CMS has provided additional guidance to state Medicaid programs. In addition to clarifying which providers are affected by this requirement, the CMS guidance also explains the impact of the Act’s employee education requirements on a provider’s contractors. Affected contractors would include not only those that perform billing and coding functions but any vendor that providers use to furnish Medicaid reimbursed goods or services. Not only must a provider implement compliance policies that are included in its employee handbook, but it must ensure that its policies are abided by its contractors and the contractors’ employees. While CMS indicates that current contracts between providers and their contractors need not be amended to comply with the Act, contractors must agree to abide by, i.e., adopt and enforce, provider policies on employee false claims education and policies and procedures for detecting and preventing fraud, waste and abuse. Although the CMS guidance was not released until March 22, 2007, the deadline for provider compliance was January 1, 2007. Enforcement of the Act’s employee education provisions, including whether noncompliance can lead to removal from a state’s Medicaid program, is left up to the states.
CMS provides guidance on employee education about false claims recovery
Popular related articles
-
The top five intellectual property traps in M&A transactions (McDermott Will & Emery)
In M&A transactions, many lawyers assume that intellectual property (IP) rights will automatically transfer with the purchase and that IP issues can be cured by general representations and warranties.
-
U.S. and EU expand sanctions against Iran (Jones Day)
On June 9, 2010, responding to Iran's continued refusal to suspend its nuclear enrichment program and accept international safeguards, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1929.
-
A list of common M&A transaction showstoppers (Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr PC)
The following is a list of typical "showstoppers" that can derail an M&A transaction or result in a reduction of the purchase price.
-
The top five employee benefits and executive compensation traps in M&A transactions (McDermott Will & Emery)
In M&A transactions, many lawyers (and clients) assume that employee benefits issues are tangential to the overall business deal and will "work themselves out" after the deal closes.
-
The top five real estate traps in M&A transactions (McDermott Will & Emery)
In the myriad M&A transactions, for the technology company, hospital chain, pharmaceutical company or consulting firm, the M&A professional's thoughts turn to supply contracts, union and pension obligations, intellectual property, key executives, debt levels and, of course, earnings.
-
Interns: to pay or not to pay? That is the question .. (Mayer Brown LLP)
As the Summer vacation period draws to a close, a number of students will be knocking on the door of employers, looking for an internship: a chance to gain experience of working life before undertaking further study or committing to a full-time career.
-
Holiday for workers on long-term sick (Kennedys)
There has been considerable litigation regarding the holiday entitlement of workers on long-term sick leave.
-
Effective date of termination is end of employee’s notice period (Kennedys)
In the recent case of Wedgewood v Minstergate Hull Ltd the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered the question of when the effective date of termination takes place when, after a period of notice has been agreed or stipulated, an employee is not required to work out all or part of their notice period.
-
Equality Act update: pay “gagging” clauses (Kennedys)
As we have been reporting in recent editions of Employment Brief, the Equality Act 2010 is due to come in to force in October 2010.
-
Visusoft Limited v Robert Harris and ARH Software Solutions Ltd (Matheson Ormsby Prentice)
Mr Harris was employed by Visusoft Limited from January 2005 to March 2006.
-
Baxter fine a warning for those who bundle products or services (Clayton Utz)
The Federal Court's decision to fine Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd $4.9 million for breaches of the misuse of market power and exclusive dealing provisions of the Trade Practices Act 1974 is a warning to any company which bundles products or services together (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 929).
-
Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) publishes details of the loss of children’s personal sensitive information (Mills & Reeve LLP)
The ICO has published details of the action it has taken against three local authorities and an NHS trust following breaches of the Data Protection Act 1998 in relation to children's medical records.
-
The rise and fall of internet sperm donation sites (Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP)
A Google search "looking for sperm donors" brings up over 70,000 results.
-
Drug and alcohol testing policies (Avanti Law LLC)
What is your organization's stance on drug testing?
-
CMS publishes “meaningful use” health IT final rule (Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP)
In late July, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published the "meaningful use" final rule in the Federal Register.
-
Privilege issues (Dorsey & Whitney LLP)
A class action discrimination lawsuit was filed against our company.
-
Flammable Fabrics Act - a reminder for importers and retailers (Dorsey & Whitney LLP)
The Flammable Fabrics Act (FFA), 15 U.S.C. 1191 et seq., was passed in 1953 in response to public concern over serious burn incidents involving brushed rayon high pile sweaters (referred to as "torch sweaters") and children's cowboy chaps which ignited easily and flash burned.
-
Disability discrimination and the interactive process (Dorsey & Whitney LLP)
One of our manufacturing employees, call him Jim, was fairly seriously injured in an accident on the production floor.
-
Ninth Circuit provides clarity on similarly situated standard for discrimination cases (Dorsey & Whitney LLP)
On August 16, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the United States District Court for the District of Arizona's grant of summary judgment in favor of former employer Executive Jet Management ("Executive Management") against three former employees Gregory Hawn, Michael Prince and Aric Aldrich ("Plaintiffs") on their Title VII sex discrimination claims.
-
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act - application to foreign private issuers (Dorsey & Whitney LLP)
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Act") into law.
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.

