Endoheart AG v. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, C.A. No. 14-1473 – LPS, March 31, 2016.
Stark, C. J. Non-party’s motion to intervene is granted. Magistrate’s report and recommendation is adopted and plaintiff’s objections are overruled.
Proposed intervenor argued that it is entitled to a declaratory judgment that it is the owner of the patent-in-suit and to certain applications and inventions described in the applications. Plaintiff objects to the scope of the intervention but the magistrate properly declined to narrow the scope. The intervenor has shown that its interests may be inadequately protected if not permitted to intervene.