Update on the status of nominations to the NLRB
We previously reported on President Obama’s nomination of three individuals, Democrats Craig Becker and Mark Pearce, and Republican Brian Hayes, to the National Labor Relation Board (“NLRB”). The most controversial nominee, AFL-CIO Associate General Counsel Becker, has come under criticism from lawmakers and employers for his well-documented pro-union views. Becker’s nomination has been blocked by Republican senators in light of these concerns, as well as concerns that he would have to recuse himself from a great number of cases for up to two years after his confirmation in light of his current employment with the AFL-CIO and the Service Employees International Union.
Department of Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, speaking at the AFL-CIO’s Executive Council meeting on March 3, indicated that unions would be very pleased with how Becker’s nomination gets resolved. This implies that Becker will be appointed to the NLRB as a recess appointment later this month, which does not require Senate approval, for a term of up to 20 months.
If Becker and fellow Democratic nominee Pearce, a former NLRB Regional Attorney from Buffalo, are appointed, they would join current NLRB Chair Wilma Liebman to form a three person Democratic majority on the NLRB. There is concern that Becker, and this new found majority, might attempt to implement some parts of the Employee Free Choice Act via administrative rule making or by means of NLRB decisions and case law. Possible changes could include more expeditious representation elections and/or the use of card check for recognition in some situations.
This development bears watching. The potential for change in a number of areas with a change in the composition of the Board is great. This includes a number of Bush-Board NLRB decisions about which we have previously reported.
Popular related articles
-
In the late 1980s, Clemens Franek sought and received trademark registration status for his "radical" round beach towel.
-
Plaintiff IDG USA, LLC (“IDG”), a Georgia company with its principal place of business in North Carolina, commenced an action against a former employee, Kevin J. Schupp (“Schupp”), a New York resident, alleging breaches of a Non-Compete Agreement, breach of a Confidentiality Agreement, unfair competition, and theft of trade secrets.
-
A 10-year employee accounting manager systematically transfers amounts via ACH to her personal checking account.
-
On August 11, 2010, a federal court rejected a terminated employee's "cat's paw" argument.
-
Massachusetts recently enacted an economic development statute which contains an important amendment to the Massachusetts Personnel Records Statute, G.L. c. 149, § 52C.
-
Plaintiff IDG USA, LLC (“IDG”), a Georgia company with its principal place of business in North Carolina, commenced an action against a former employee, Kevin J. Schupp (“Schupp”), a New York resident, alleging breaches of a Non-Compete Agreement, breach of a Confidentiality Agreement, unfair competition, and theft of trade secrets.
-
A 10-year employee accounting manager systematically transfers amounts via ACH to her personal checking account.
-
On August 11, 2010, a federal court rejected a terminated employee's "cat's paw" argument.
-
Massachusetts recently enacted an economic development statute which contains an important amendment to the Massachusetts Personnel Records Statute, G.L. c. 149, § 52C.
-
Employers are increasingly tracking their employees' whereabouts as smartphones, laptops, and vehicles equipped with location-tracing technology become ever more prevalent.
-
Earlier this year, we posted on the New York State Department of Labor's new regulations governing New York's WARN Act, the state statute that requires certain employers to provide 90 days notice to employees, their employees' unions, if any, and to government agencies, before engaging in certain actions which result in losses of employment.
-
The New York State Department of Labor recently added to its website opinion letters written by its Counsel's Office.
-
On July 23, 2010, the Supreme Court of Albany County upheld the constitutionality of Chapter 45 of the Laws of 2010.
-
An employer that has entered into a settlement agreement with OSHA, or that has been found in violation of OSHA regulations or the general duty clause - either by order of an Administrative Law Judge or as a consequence of accepting a citation - should adhere to all provisions of any agreement, and abate all cited conditions.
-
Yesterday, April 14, 2010, among ten bills signed into law by Governor David A. Paterson was Senate Bill S-6972/Assembly Bill 10065 (the “55/25 legislation”), which is the early retirement incentive bill for members of New York State United Teachers ("NYSUT") who belong to either the New York State Employee Retirement System ("ERS") or the New York State Teachers Retirement System ("TRS").
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please
contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.
