On 21st February, the Judges in the Court of Appeal dismissed the Appeal of Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan, for the right of a couple of the same sex to be able to enter into a civil partnership. This has caused a stir in the media and the decision has been referred to as ‘discriminatory’ and a ‘Breach of Human Rights’. (Steinfeld and Keidan v Secretary of State for Education Judgement  EWCA Civ 81].
The case of Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan
In 2014, Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan notified the Chelsea Registry office that they wanted a Civil Partnership. They were informed that they could not have one as the law stands in England and Wales. They therefore made an application to court arguing that couples of a different sex should also be able to enter into a Civil Partnership instead of a marriage if they wished to do so. They were not successful in their case that went to the Court of Appeal.
Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan explained to the Court of Appeal, their reasons why they did not want to marry, (which included that they felt marriage did not reflect their values and did not reflect their equality within their relationship)and that they preferred to enter into a civil partnership. They argued that they, as a different sex couple should be able to enter into a civil partnership just like same sex couples do so that they can have the legal rights that a couple in a civil partnership have at present.
Present position in England and Wales
At present, couples of the same sex have three options; they can simply live together without any legal rights (cohabit), enter into a civil partnership or marry. Couples that are not of the same sex have only two options; they can either just cohabit or marry.The law in relation to civil partnerships is set out in The Civil Partnership Act 1974. Section 3(1) (a) of the Civil Partnership Act 1974 prohibits couples who are not of the same sex from entering into a Civil Partnership.
A couple living together who have neither married nor entered into a civil partnership are referred to as cohabitees. A cohabitee does not have the same legal rights as either a married person or a person in a civil partnership. There is no legal recognition of a ‘common law wife’. To have any legal rights, a different sex couple would have to marry (which is not what Rebecca Steinfeld and Charles Keidan wanted to do), whilst a same sex couple have the option of either entering into a civil partnership or to marry.
The Civil Partnership Act 2004 (Amendment) Bill 2016-17
Tim Loughton MP for East Worthing and Shoreham, has presented a Bill (The Civil Partnership Act 2004 (Amendment) Bill 2016-17) before Parliament to amend The Civil Partnership Act1974to allow couples of a different sex to enter into a Civil Partnership.This Bill came before Parliament for a second reading on 13th January 2017 but it was adjourned to have the second reading on 24th March 2017.
The Government’s position
It appears that the Government is adopting a cautious ‘wait and see’ approach. Statistical data has shown that since same sex couples have been able to marry, there have been less civil partnerships taking place and more of them have been dissolving. The government is therefore waiting to see what effect there will be on the number of civil partnerships being taken up by same sex couples now that they also have the option to marry. If the government sees that fewer and fewer people are choosing to enter into a civil partnership, then the government may decide to abolish civil partnership altogether.
It is important for couples to seek independent legal advice to ensure that they do have documentation in place to show their intentions and wishes, in particular in relation to finances, property and inheritance.