This update is a brief synopsis of a case that held, if there is not a certain FAR provision addressing subcontracting limitations in a set aside contract for small business, there is not a mandatory duty to comply with the subcontracting limitations.

GAO Decision NCS/EML JV, LLC B-412277.3  (January 2014)

This was a protest on a routine Low Price Technically Acceptable contract with a twist.  The protestor alleged that the awardee failed to comply with FAR clause 52.219-14, limitations on subcontracting on a small business set aside contract.  (Page 9)

The GAO found, citing an earlier precedent, that since the Request for Proposal did not contain the FAR clause, the awardee was not bound to follow it.  The GAO went on to reject that the Christian Doctrine, which automatically inserts mandatory clauses into a contract when they are left out, did not apply because it was not a mandatory provision.

Practice Pointer: if you are going to bid, propose, or protest a small business set aside contract, look for that FAR provision.