Privileged documents produced in response to a grand-jury subpoena cannot be withheld in subsequent civil litigation (even litigation about Superman), according to this opinion from the Ninth Circuit. The party asserting the privilege attempted to shield production in the civil case by claiming they had only "selectively waived" the privilege to respond to the subpoena. The Ninth Circuit rejected that claim. The court reasoned it may be appropriate to recognize a new privilege to protect from civil litigants documents provided to the government. But the court refused to do so, considering it more properly within the legislature's purview to do so.
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.
RegisterIf you have any questions about the service please contact customerservices@lexology.com or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
It's a bird! It's a plane! It's an attorney-client waiver opinion!
- Day Pitney LLP
- USA
- May 1 2012
-
Tags
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.
Jennifer Miller
Senior Legal Counsel, Bankwest Business
Bank of Western Australia Ltd