Here are three recent Section 2(d) appeals, one of which resulted in a reversal. Which one? [Answer will be found in first comment].

In re Don Sebastiani & Sons International Wine Negotiants Restoque Int’l LLC, Serial No. 86692212 (May 30, 2017) [not precedential]. [Section 2(d) refusal of CONTIGO for spirits, in view of the registered mark SOLO CONTIGO for wine].

In re Dennis Binkley, Serial No. 86429294 (May 30, 2017) [not precedential]. [Section 2(d) refusal BUNGEE BLAST for "Foam flying toy; Hand-powered non-mechanical flying toy" [BUNGEE disclaimed] in view of the registered mark BUNGEE GLIDERZ for “Toy airplanes; Toy gliders; Toy sling planes" [GLIDERZ disclaimed].

In re Kim-C1, LLC, Serial No. 86757650 (May 31, 2017) [not precedential]. [Section 2(d) refusal of SPLENDOR for "Plant growth regulators for agricultural use" in view of the registered mark SPLENDORGRO for "mulch; peat moss; colored wood chips for use as ground cover; and plant seeds," and for "compost; potting soil; humus; plant food"].