In a lawsuit brought by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) alleging failure to meet a deadline to set limits on perchlorate levels in drinking water, a New York federal court has issued an order adopting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) preferred language to admit the failure. Nat. Res. Def. Council v. EPA, No. 16-1251 (S.D.N.Y., order entered September 19, 2016).
An EPA attorney reportedly admitted in court that the agency had missed the deadline of February 11, 2013, to set limits on perchlorate in drinking water after announcing its intention to propose regulations two years prior. NRDC and EPA then submitted proposed orders admitting the failure, and the court adopted EPA’s language without further discussion. See Law360, September 20, 2016.
The court’s order finds that (i) EPA triggered a non-discretionary duty to propose a maximum contaminant level goal by February 11, 2013; (ii) EPA failed to propose that goal by the deadline; and (iii) the inaction “constituted a failure to perform a non-discretionary act or duty under the Safe Drinking Water Act.”