Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC)

Welcome back Mr Badertscher







Commission consults on revised draft Block Exemption regulation for insurance sector

View original document | Send to colleague | Print | Suggest a topic (new)
Hammonds LLP
European Union
October 31 2009

On 5 October 2009, the Commission announced that it is inviting comments on its revised draft Block Exemption Regulation (“BER”) for the insurance sector. The previous insurance BER expires on 31 March 2010.    

The purpose of the BER is to exempt certain agreements between insurance companies from the EU prohibition on cartel activity and restrictive business practices under Article 81 of the EC Treaty.

There are currently several categories of agreements exempted by the BER, including: co-operation and information sharing between insurers; the joint establishment of standard policy conditions for direct insurance, and non-binding models on profits; the setting up and operation of certain co-insurance or reinsurance pools; the joint testing and acceptance of agreements relating to security devices, which involves their installation and maintenance, as well as ensuring compliance. The Commission believes that the BER should no longer cover the establishment of non-binding standard policy conditions or agreements on security devices. It plans to retain two of the categories with minor amendments: the co-operation and information sharing between insurers and the creation and operation of insurance pools.

The Commission is seeking views on three issues in particular: (1) whether the insurance sector is “special” compared to other sectors, with an enhanced need for cooperation; (2) if so, does this enhanced need require a legal instrument to protect or facilitate it; (3) and if so, what is the most appropriate legal instrument?

The consultation ends on 30 November 2009.

Diarmuid Ryan

Diarmuid Ryan

Tom S. Pick

Tom S. Pick

Popular related articles

  1. Parties cannot avoid Commercial Agents Regulations by choice of non-EU law and arbitration (Herbert Smith LLP)

    In Accentuate v Asigra [2009] EWHC 2655 (QB) the English High Court held it had jurisdiction to hear a claim for compensation under the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993, even though the relevant agreement was subject to a choice of Canadian law and arbitration and the Canadian arbitral tribunal had already ruled against the claim.

  2. You don't need to be prompt, just don't be too late (MacRoberts)

    On 28 January, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) handed down its judgment in Uniplex (UK) Ltd (Uniplex) v NHS Business Services Authority (NHS) (C-406/08).

  3. Product liability - can defendants be substituted outside the 10-year limitation period? (Bristows)

    In December 2009 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered a judgment concerning liability for defective products and, in particular, the possibility to substitute defendants outside the 10-year limitation period.

  4. Hunton & Williams prepares study for the European Commission on the interaction between data protection law and copyright enforcement (Hunton & Williams LLP)

    On February 3, 2010, Christopher Kuner, a partner in Hunton & Williams' Brussels office and head of the firm's EU Privacy Practice, presented to the "Stakeholders' Dialogue on Illegal Uploading and Downloading," organized by DG Internal Market and Services of the European Commission.

  5. Competition law in transport: review of 2009 (Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP)

    This article describes the main developments in the application of European Competition law in the transport sector during 2009.

  6. T-Mobile and Orange seek EU approval to create largest wireless carrier in the United Kingdom (Patton Boggs LLP)

    Deutsche Telekom AG and France Telecom SA submitted their proposed merger of T-Mobile UK and Orange UK to European Union antitrust regulators for review.

  7. EU approves new standard contractual clauses for transfers to data processors (Hunton & Williams LLP)

    On February 5, 2010, the European Commission adopted a new set of standard contractual clauses ("SCCs") for transfers of personal data from data controllers in the EU to data processors outside the EU.

  8. European Commission passes new e-Privacy Directive requiring mandatory data breach notification by public communications providers (A&L Goodbody)

    The European Commission has passed a new e-Privacy Directive 2009/136/EC (the Directive) which makes it mandatory for public communications providers (ISPs and telcos) to inform national regulatory authorities of any data security breach.

  9. AIFM directive: Spanish presidency publishes issues note on draft versions (Clifford Chance LLP)

    The EU Council has published an issues note prepared by the Spanish Presidency comparing the EU Council's 15 December 2009 compromise proposal and the EU Parliament's draft report by Jean-Paul Gauzès, Rapporteur to the ECON Committee.

  10. Continued competition monitoring for pharma settlement agreements (Bristows)

    In July of last year, a tentative sigh of relief could be heard from the much of innovative pharma sector.

  1. Fifth Circuit holds that “occurrence” policy covers breach of warranty allegations against insurer (Hunton & Williams LLP)

    In Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Maverick Tube Corporation, No. 09-20071, 2009 WL 4680813 (5th Cir. Dec. 10, 2009), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a contract for general liability insurance would afford coverage for a breach of warranty claim resulting from a product defect.

  2. FSA consults on effective corporate governance (Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge)

    On 28 January 2010 the FSA issued a consultation paper on effective governance, focusing on significant influence controlled functions and Sir David Walker's review of corporate governance in banks and other financial firms.

  3. FY 2011 budget contains a number of tax proposals targeting insurance companies (Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP)

    On February 1, 2010, the Administration released its fiscal year 2011 budget (FY 2011 Budget).

  4. Pulling cover: lenders' claims under the Third Party (Rights Against Insurers) Act 1930 (Hammonds LLP)

    Goldsmith Williams (a firm) v Travelers Insurance Company Limited [2010] EWHC 26 QB reminds us of the problems faced by lenders bringing negligence claims where the Defendant's professional indemnity insurance cover has been withdrawn.

  5. Florida OIR to begin workers’ compensation excess-profits rulemaking (Foley & Lardner LLP)

    The Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR) has agreed to begin proceedings to adopt a new rule to implement the Florida workers' compensation excess-profits law.

  6. Rebutting insurer myths about rescission under California law (Farella Braun & Martel LLP)

    In recent years, asserting a rescission claims has been an increasingly favored defense raised by insurers, often with little or no factual basis.

  7. Federal court issues injunction requiring insurer to advance defense costs to Stanford Financial defendants for DOJ and SEC proceedings (Haynes and Boone LLP)

    Yesterday, January 26, 2010, Judge David Hittner of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued an important opinion in the Stanford Financial case that paves the way for targets of criminal and civil enforcement proceedings to obtain insurance coverage for costs of defending themselves.

  8. Fraud exclusion - just how virtuous do innocent partners have to be? (Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP)

    Goldsmith Williams v Travelers Insurance is the first decision to consider the dishonesty exclusion in a solicitor's professional indemnity policy, since the 2006 decision in Zurich v Karim.

  9. Directors’ and officers’ liabilities in an insolvency context (Ogilvy Renault LLP)

    Directors and officers of corporations are often subject to potential personal liabilities as a result of their positions.

  10. Amending business associate agreements to comply with the HITECH Act (Morris Manning & Martin LLP)

    As insurers, producers and administrative service providers work towards compliance with the privacy and data security requirements of the Health Information Technology for Economic Clinical Health Act ("HITECH"), one particularly thorny issue is "What needs to be done with business associate agreements?"

  1. Virgin Blue and Delta Air Lines joint venture authorised (Blake Dawson)

    Authorisation has been granted by the ACCC to Virgin Blue and Delta Air Lines for a joint venture on their flights between Australia and the US.

  2. C7 decision: meaning of ‘purpose’ (Freehills)

    On 2 December 2009, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia handed down its decision in Seven Network Limited v News Limited, the appeal from the widely publicised 'C7' decision in 2007.

  3. Lower thresholds for both Competition Act and Investment Canada Act in 2010 (Stikeman Elliott LLP)

    Unless changed by regulation, the "size of target" threshold for advance notification under the Competition Act of transactions involving Canadian businesses will likely be reduced to C$67 million, in accordance with the GDP indexing provisions which were introduced in amendments to the Act last March.

  4. Competition law in transport: review of 2009 (Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP)

    This article describes the main developments in the application of European Competition law in the transport sector during 2009.

  5. Ticketmaster and Live Nation agree to consent agreement to resolve Competition Bureau concerns (Stikeman Elliott LLP)

    On January 25, 2010, the Competition Bureau announced that it had entered into a consent agreement with Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc. and Live Nation, Inc. to resolve competition concerns identified by the Bureau with respect to their proposed merger.

  6. When is a global market a ‘market in Australia’ for the purposes of the TPA (DibbsBarker)

    The recent decision of the Full Court of the Australian Federal Court in the case of Singapore Airlines Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2009] FCAFC 136 is likely to have ramifications for overseas entities conducting business in global markets including Australia.

  7. T-Mobile and Orange seek EU approval to create largest wireless carrier in the United Kingdom (Patton Boggs LLP)

    Deutsche Telekom AG and France Telecom SA submitted their proposed merger of T-Mobile UK and Orange UK to European Union antitrust regulators for review.

  8. Dampier to Bunbury Natural Gas Pipeline undertakings varied (Blake Dawson)

    The ACCC has consented to vary undertakings accepted in 2004 as a condition for approval of the acquisition of the Dampier to Bunbury Natural Gas Pipeline (DBNGP) by a consortium comprising Alinta, Alcoa and DUET.

  9. ACCC approves joint venture of Virgin Blue and Delta Air Lines (Freehills)

    The ACCC has authorised a joint venture between Virgin Blue Group (Virgin) and Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta) in relation to flights between Australia and the USA.

  10. Competition and antitrust in Canada (McMillan LLP)

    First enacted in 1889, Canadian competition legislation predates the Sherman Act.

  1. Personal liability of directors for company acts of IP infringement (Hammonds LLP)

    In Boegli Gravures SA v (1) Darsail (2) Andrei Pyzhov, the High Court summarised when a director will be personally liable for an intellectual property infringement committed by the company.

  2. Guidance on ‘Wrotham Park' damages for breach of contract (Hammonds LLP)

    In Pell Frischmann Engineering Limited v (1) Bow Valley (2) P T Bakrie, the Privy Council has given guidance on how ‘Wrotham Park’ damages should be assessed.

  3. Company not a ‘subsidiary’ where parent has charged its shares (Hammonds LLP)

    In Enviroco Limited v Farstad Supply A/S, the Court of Appeal held that where a parent company provided shares in its subsidiary as security for a loan and the shares were registered in the name of the lender, the subsidiary would no longer be a ‘subsidiary’ within the meaning of sections 736 and 736A of the Companies Act 1985.

  4. Vodka protected by extended passing off (Hammonds LLP)

    In Diageo v International Brands, the High Court has ruled on an unusual case of extended passing off.

  5. Take it or lose it (Hammonds LLP)

    In a decision that will warm the hearts of HR professionals and line managers alike, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has held in Lyons v Mitie Security Ltd that annual leave not taken close to the end of the relevant leave year can be lost by a worker, provided that the employer does not operate its leave procedures and conditions so as to deny requests for leave unreasonably.

  6. Limited liability partnerships: impact of the Companies Act 2006 (Hammonds LLP)

    Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) continue to be governed primarily by the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 (the LLP Act).

  7. Another case on the patent employee compensation provisions (Hammonds LLP)

    In Shanks v Unilever, the High Court has provided further guidance on the interpretation of the employee compensation provisions in the Patents Act 1977.

  8. Court of Appeal rules on Star Wars copyright dispute (Hammonds LLP)

    In Lucasfilm v Andrew Ainsworth the Court of Appeal has ruled on various copyright issues including what constitutes a ‘sculpture’ within the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA) and whether US copyright can be directly enforced in the English courts.

  9. Commission guidance on Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (Hammonds LLP)

    The European Commission has published guidance on the interpretation of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (2005/29/EC).

  10. Lord Justice Jackson's final report on costs in civil litigation (Hammonds LLP)

    Lord Justice Jackson's final report on costs in civil litigation was published on 14 January 2010 with recommendations aimed at reducing excessive and disproportionate costs.

Most popular articles on Lexology

View original document | Send to colleague | Print

If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.

© Copyright 2006-2010 Globe Business Publishing Ltd