Incentive payments for hospital-based physicians under HITECH
The devil is in the definition, as least when it comes to getting financial incentive payments for the adoption of electronic health records (EHR). The American Hospital Association (AHA) recently asked the White House Office of Health Reform, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to revise the definition of "hospital-based" so that physicians working in hospital outpatient clinics or hospital-based facilities can receive incentive payments from Medicare and Medicaid under the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA).
In many ways, AHA's request makes sense. If ARRA is to incentivize "meaningful use" of EHR, it should not exclude physician users practicing in off-site clinic or outpatient locations -- these are often the very physicians whose implementation and use of EHR is key to the creation of a community-wide EHR infrastructure. In other ways, though, AHA's request is a vexing reminder of the mental contortions required to maintain the old meanings and purposes of terms while introducing new ones.
Whether an outpatient or "provider-based" clinic qualifies as part of the hospital for reimbursement purposes varies from state to state and from payer to payer. AHA's request to expand the definition for purposes of ARRA incentive payments seems to make sense from an EHR-policy implementation perspective, but folding in yet another "hospital-based" definition for ARRA purposes challenges the conceptual integrity of the word -- and starts to make my head spin.
The AHA letter is available at http://www.aha.org/aha/letter/2009/091204-let-hit-arra.pdf.
Popular related articles
-
In the late 1980s, Clemens Franek sought and received trademark registration status for his "radical" round beach towel.
-
Plaintiff IDG USA, LLC (“IDG”), a Georgia company with its principal place of business in North Carolina, commenced an action against a former employee, Kevin J. Schupp (“Schupp”), a New York resident, alleging breaches of a Non-Compete Agreement, breach of a Confidentiality Agreement, unfair competition, and theft of trade secrets.
-
A 10-year employee accounting manager systematically transfers amounts via ACH to her personal checking account.
-
On August 11, 2010, a federal court rejected a terminated employee's "cat's paw" argument.
-
Massachusetts recently enacted an economic development statute which contains an important amendment to the Massachusetts Personnel Records Statute, G.L. c. 149, § 52C.
-
On August 11, 2010, a federal court rejected a terminated employee's "cat's paw" argument.
-
On July 14, 2010, Secretary Kathleen Sebelius of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published notice in the Federal Register of proposed rulemaking1 aimed at "strengthening" the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) privacy, security and enforcement regulations (collectively referred to as the "HIPAA Rules") and as required by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act), which was enacted as a part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
-
In the last two months, the Department of Labor, the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Health and Human Services published three additional sets of interim final regulations to address compliance requirements in the first significant round of changes to impact group health plans under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).
-
The health reform law requires non-grandfathered group health plans to meet new standards for processing internal claims and appeals, and also requires these plans to implement a new external review procedure.
-
On July 19, 2010, the United States Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury issued interim final regulations covering the mandates under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended (the "Health Care Reform Act"), relating to the internal and external claims review process.
-
On August 18, 2010, a complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that Specific Media, Inc. violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, as well as state privacy and computer security laws, by failing to provide adequate notice regarding its online tracking practices.
-
The Information Commissioner has recently issued guidance, specifically aimed at Local Education Authorities and those working within the education sector, addressing the confusion surrounding the taking of photographs and videos in educational institutions.
-
Increasingly, clubs and pubs are using technology to electronically capture identity information about their customers.
-
On July 14, 2010, Secretary Kathleen Sebelius of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published notice in the Federal Register of proposed rulemaking1 aimed at "strengthening" the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) privacy, security and enforcement regulations (collectively referred to as the "HIPAA Rules") and as required by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act), which was enacted as a part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
-
The Financial Services Authority ("FSA") has imposed a fine of £2.27 million on the UK branch of insurance company Zurich for loss of customer data.
-
Lately I have been fielding a lot of questions relating to employee benefits issues in mergers and acquisitions.
-
I'm not sure why we can't seem to settle the question of what IP litigation is covered under the typical Comprehensive General Liability insurance policy.
-
US and international accounting proposals are being circulated which could impact the way private equity, venture capital and other alternative private investment funds explain how they appraised an asset including real estate.
-
While the focus on health care reform has been primarily major medical plans, there is no question that the new laws have a considerable impact on cafeteria plans.
-
At the present time the good people of the Swiss Federal Tax Administration are sorting out which of the thousands of requested names of US persons and account numbers with UBS will be turned over to the United States shortly in accordance with the U.S.-Swiss agreement.
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please
contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.
