The Spanish Competition Authority fines five oil companies €32 million
The Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia or CNMC has imposed fines for more than €32 million to REPSOL, Compañía Española de Petróleos (CEPSA); DISA Corporación Petrolífera; GALP Energía España S.A. and MEROIL S.A. for price fixing and sharing sensitive information. Out of the total amount of the fine, €30 million were imposed to REPSOL and CEPSA.
According to the CNMC, the five companies, active in the market of production and distribution of oil products, entered into the following bilateral agreements and exchanges of information:
Click here to view table.
REPSOL has received the highest fine (€20 million), followed by CEPSA (€10 million), DISA (€1.3 million), GALP (€800,000) and MEROIL (€300,000).
In the context of the same investigation, the CNMC also detected coordination between the above companies and their independent distributors of automotive fuel. This resolution is still pending.
€88.2 million fine to Spanish dairy processors for colluding on the price paid to livestock owners for raw milk
The CNMC has fined 9 dairies and two associations for, on the one hand, exchanging strategic information on prices, volumes to be acquired from farmers and milk surplus stocks and, on the other hand, coordinating prices for acquiring raw milk and sharing markets.
According to the CNMC, the strategic information was exchanged in different forums and concerned different topics but it had the common objective of colluding and adopting a joint strategy to control the market of supply of raw milk.
In addition, these exchanges of information led in some cases to concrete agreements for (i) coordinating prices at which raw milk was acquired and (ii) sharing the market.
In this sense, dairy manufacturers shared information about prices offered to farmers, identity of the farmers; future prices and volumes. Moreover, they shared the identity of those farmers who were planning to change dairy manufacturer and the measures to avoid it.
Furthermore, the companies controlled the surplus stocks and their transformation into powdered milk which had an impact in the price of raw milk.
Out of the total €88.2 million fine, Danone S.A. and Corporación Alimentaria Peñasanta S.A. have received the highest fines (€23.2 million and €21.8 million respectively). They are followed by Grupo Lactalis Iberia (€11.6 million); Nestlé España S.A. (€10.6 million); Puleva Food S.L. (€10.2 million); Calidad Pascual (€8.5 million); Senoble Ibérica S.L. (€929,644); Central Lechera Asturiana S.A.T. (€698,477) and Central Lechera de Galicia S.L. (€53,310).
Pursuant to Article 68 of the Spanish Competition Act, serious continuous infringements expire four years after the infringement ceases. In this sense, the infringement has been declared expired for five companies, i.e. Lácteas Asturianas S.A. (which last exchange of strategic information took place in January 2010); Forlactaria Operadores Lecheros S.A. (which participated in the cartel only in 2006); Grupo Leche Rio S.A.; Feriaco Lácteos S.L. and Leche Celta S.L. (which participated in the infraction in 2008 and 2009).
Finally, two associations have been fined for their role as facilitators of the infringement: Gremio de Industrias Lácteas de Cataluña (€200.000) and Asociación de Empresas Lácteas de Galicia (€100,000).
Case-Law & Analysis
Dawn raids in the Belgian travel sector declared illegal by the Brussels Court of Appeal
At the beginning of 2006, a series of dawn raids took place at the premises of several tour operators and travel agents in Belgium, mainly TUI Travel, Jetair, BCD Travel, Belgian Travel Organization and American Express Corporate Travel.
In 2011, the investigation division within the Belgian Competition authority sent reports to the decision-making body of the authority, but no decision was adopted at that moment, i.e. the case was left under review. On the basis of the transitional provisions of the new Belgian Competition Act, the reports drafted for cases pending at the time of the entry into force of the new Act (i.e. 2013) were automatically converted into statements of objections subject to the procedural provisions of the new Act. Based on these statements of objections, the companies challenged the legality of the inspections.
On 18 February 2015, the Brussels Court of Appeal delivered an important judgment where it was held that the dawn raids carried out in the premises of the companies abovementioned were unlawful. As a consequence, all the information seized during or as a result of the dawn raids must be taken out of the file and returned to the parties who were raided.
On the one hand, the Court considered that the decision ordering the dawn raids issued by the Competition authority at its sole initiative did not constitute a sufficient means of protection under the Belgian constitution. A judicial warrant was therefore needed, even if in 2006 the Belgian Competition Act did not require such a judicial warrant for carrying out dawn raids (contrary to what is provided in the new Competition Act of 2013). On the other hand, the Court considered that, at that time, there was no possibility for the parties to challenge the lawfulness of the dawn raids before an independent judge on the basis of the Belgian Competition Act of 1999 -then into force-, which amount to a violation of Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights (right to a fair trial) and Article 47 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights (right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial).
Recently, the lawfulness of other dawn raids carried out by the Belgian Competition authority has been challenged on the same grounds. One of these cases is related to cargo handling in the harbour of Antwerp and another one concerns the healthcare, hygiene and perfume sector in Belgium.