Wrestler Hulk Hogan and the estate of Marlon Brando both filed suit recently, claiming that their publicity rights were being violated and likenesses misappropriated.
Brando and Hogan sue to enforce publicity rights
Popular related articles
-
Circular beach towel's trademark is invalid (Kelley Drye & Warren LLP)
In the late 1980s, Clemens Franek sought and received trademark registration status for his "radical" round beach towel.
-
Western District of New York upholds non-compete and grants TRO (Seyfarth Shaw LLP)
Plaintiff IDG USA, LLC (“IDG”), a Georgia company with its principal place of business in North Carolina, commenced an action against a former employee, Kevin J. Schupp (“Schupp”), a New York resident, alleging breaches of a Non-Compete Agreement, breach of a Confidentiality Agreement, unfair competition, and theft of trade secrets.
-
Shutting down corporate pick-pockets (Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP)
A 10-year employee accounting manager systematically transfers amounts via ACH to her personal checking account.
-
Employer wins “cat's paw” case (Foley & Lardner LLP)
On August 11, 2010, a federal court rejected a terminated employee's "cat's paw" argument.
-
Massachusetts personnel records statute amended to require employers to notify employees when negative information is placed in personnel records (Goodwin Procter LLP)
Massachusetts recently enacted an economic development statute which contains an important amendment to the Massachusetts Personnel Records Statute, G.L. c. 149, § 52C.
-
Circular beach towel's trademark is invalid (Kelley Drye & Warren LLP)
In the late 1980s, Clemens Franek sought and received trademark registration status for his "radical" round beach towel.
-
Specsavers v ASDA - a real eye-opener? (Herbert Smith LLP)
The High Court has held that one of ASDA's marketing straplines used to promote its in-store optician took unfair advantage of Specsavers' Community Trade Marks (CTM) under Article 9(1)(c) of the CTM Regulation, but rejected its infringement claims made under Article 9(1)(b) and for passing-off.
-
Is your trade mark distinctive or just descriptive? (Clayton Utz)
Exotic Limo Pty Ltd applied to register ExoticLimo (stylised) for car hire and chauffeuring services.
-
Custom furniture: innovative plan or illegal imitation? (Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice PLLC)
Today's Wall Street Journal, San Francisco Bay Area edition, includes a very interesting article on start up furniture companies whose business model includes reproducing popular furniture designs on a custom basis.
-
Court of Justice rules on another AdWords case (Marks & Clerk)
In July, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled on the case Protakabin Ltd and Portakabin BV v Primakabin BV in the Netherlands, which involved use of registered trade marks as sponsored keywords.
-
Misrepresentations in advertising material for the proposed sale of land: some lessons from a recent case (Norton Rose)
A recent NSW case has shed useful light on the judicial treatment of misrepresentations in advertising of properties for sale.
-
Circular beach towel's trademark is invalid (Kelley Drye & Warren LLP)
In the late 1980s, Clemens Franek sought and received trademark registration status for his "radical" round beach towel.
-
Boundary dispute over strip of driveway ends up in court (DMH Stallard LLP)
An argument over a narrow strip of land has left a mother and son facing massive costs after their case was heard in the Court of Appeal recently.
-
Western District of New York upholds non-compete and grants TRO (Seyfarth Shaw LLP)
Plaintiff IDG USA, LLC (“IDG”), a Georgia company with its principal place of business in North Carolina, commenced an action against a former employee, Kevin J. Schupp (“Schupp”), a New York resident, alleging breaches of a Non-Compete Agreement, breach of a Confidentiality Agreement, unfair competition, and theft of trade secrets.
-
The Court of Appeal provides guidance on the rules on equitable set-off; Geldof Metaalconstructie NV v Simon Carves Ltd (2010) (Mills & Reeve LLP)
Set-off effectively allows one person to deduct from sums he owes to another, amounts that the other person owes to him.
-
Specsavers v ASDA - a real eye-opener? (Herbert Smith LLP)
The High Court has held that one of ASDA's marketing straplines used to promote its in-store optician took unfair advantage of Specsavers' Community Trade Marks (CTM) under Article 9(1)(c) of the CTM Regulation, but rejected its infringement claims made under Article 9(1)(b) and for passing-off.
-
Beach Boys vs. “California Gurls” (Brooks Pierce McLendon Humphrey & Leonard LLP)
Singer Katy Perry, of "I kissed a girl, and I liked it" fame, has been threatened with a lawsuit over her use of the Beach Boys' timeless line, "I wish they all could be California Girls," in her hit song "California Gurls."
-
Entertainment industry now targets network operators (NautaDutilh)
In its European filesharing wars, the entertainment industry now targets network operators.
-
Maker of game-pirating devices caught red-handed (Minter Ellison)
The England and Wales High Court of Justice has given summary judgment in a case concerning copyright infringement and the avoidance of copyright-protection devices.
-
North Carolina Superior Court holds state shield law protects identities of newspaper website commenters (Brooks Pierce McLendon Humphrey & Leonard LLP)
On July 27, 2010, NC Superior Court Judge Calvin E Murphy ruled from the bench that North Carolina’s shield law, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8-53.11, protects a newspaper from the compelled disclosure during judicial proceedings of the identities of anonymous commenters to the newspaper’s website.
-
First statewide mandatory green building code published; effective January 1, 2011 (Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP)
The International Code Council recently published the 2010 California Green Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 11 -- otherwise known as CALGreen, the nation's first mandatory statewide green building code which was adopted January 12, 2010 by the California Building Standards Commission.
-
NAD: discontinue “soap scum” references (Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP)
The National Advertising Division recently recommended that Unilever, maker of Dove brand soap products, discontinue claims made for its Dove Beauty Bar in a challenge made by Colgate-Palmolive, the maker of Irish Spring bar soap.
-
Internet tracking, direct marketing in the news (Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP)
A recent series of articles in the Wall Street Journal about direct marketing and the use of tracking technology on the Internet have the industry on the defensive and privacy advocates calling for legislation to be passed next term.
-
Gillette settles razor ad suit for $7.5 million (Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP)
A federal judge gave preliminary approval to a settlement in a multi-district class action suit against Gillette, accusing the company of misstating the efficacy of its M3 Power Razor in ads.
-
Copyright Office and Library of Congress allow “jailbreak” of iPhones (Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP)
The Library of Congress and Copyright Office gave the go-ahead to users of smartphones - including the iPhone - to engage in "jailbreaking" by installing third-party software and modifying the operating systems.
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at ateague@lexology.com.