NUMBER OF THE WEEK: 5

The number of additional months of funding for transportation projects under a $8 billion bill introduced late last night in the House. Notably — as anyone on Sesame Street could tell you — the number 5 is not the same as the number 2, as in the two-year bill (at minimum) that Senate Republicans have in mind for highways so they can get the politically thorny issue off their plate until after the 2016 elections. Current funding for highways runs out in two weeks. More on the gaping divide between House and Senate Republicans below…

LEGISLATIVE LANDSCAPE

REGULATORY WORLD

LOOKING AHEAD

LEGISLATIVE LANDSCAPE

On the Road Again: Senate Readies Longer-Term Package as House Presses for Patch. Senate Republicans continue working on details of a two-to-four-year funding bill for the nations beleaguered highways, bridges and other transportation infrastructure, while House leaders are hoping for a vote this week on an $8 billion funding bump for the Highway Trust Fund—enough to help it coast along through Dec. 18. By then, House Ways and Means Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA) think they can have a plan hammered out for funding a longer-term solution.

Ryan and Shuster’s short-term bill, H.R. 3038 (“Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2015, Part II”), relies on a hodgepodge of spending cuts and tax compliance-related revenue raisers to get to $8 billion. It also includes a tax cut for liquefied natural gas (LNG) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) to equalize their taxation compared to diesel and gasoline based on their energy production per gallon.

Chairman Ryan has indicated that he will seek to use repatriation of U.S. multinationals’ foreign earnings, along with other international tax changes, as part of a pivot to a longer-term highway funding solution—an approach that Ryan’s counterpart in the Senate, Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT), has said he would not accept outside of a larger tax reform effort. The bill introduced last night, if passed, would add to the prospects of an end-of-the-year showdown over must-pass legislation, including the dozens of currently-expired tax extenders.

Below is a summary of the offset provisions (and one tax-reduction provision). The bill itself is available here, and Ryan and Shuster’s description of the offsets can be viewed here.

Click here to view table.

Could Extenders Catch a Ride With Highways? As House and Senate Republicans face off on funding options for highways, the next ca-tax-trophe awaits: tax extenders. The dozens of currently expired tax breaks are awaiting resurrection—something that has, in recent years, become a perennial end-of-the-year ritual with retroactive application. But this year, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has 2016 on his mind, and, like the highway funding bill, he wants to see a two-year extension so that bickering over which extenders to extend and for how long does not distract from Republicans’ “getting the job done” message.

House leaders, however, favor permanently extending a select few of the extenders, like the research and experimentation credit and Section 179 expensing, while scrapping many others. The Senate Finance Committee is rumored to be holding a mark-up of a two-year tax extender bill next Tuesday, July 21, quite possibly as a set up for McConnell to attach extenders to a highway bill. And we haven’t even discussed disagreements between Republicans and Democrats yet…. Stay tuned.

Anti-Inversion Amendment Teed Up for Senate Vote. The Senate will vote today on an amendment that would prevent companies from inverting to a lower-tax jurisdiction unless they are at least 50 percent owned by the new foreign parent. The latest anti-inversion legislation was introduced by Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) as an amendment to the education bill that is currently under consideration on the Senate floor. Casey wants to use revenue raised by increasing the inversion ownership requirements to offset of the cost of universal pre-K, which he wants to add to the education bill. Under current law, a U.S. company can move its tax domicile abroad so long as it is at least 20 percent owned by the new foreign parent.

Clinton Talks Tax on Campaign Trail. In her first major economic speech of her 2016 presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton went after several of her Republican opponents on economic policy issues, including a jab at Sen. Marco Rubio’s tax plan, which she said would reward the rich. Monday’s speech was also a chance for Clinton to highlight some of the kinds of tax changes she would seek if elected, including tax policies that would encourage businesses to share profits with employees, reforms to capital gains taxes to reward longer-term investments, and policies to give “hard working families tax relief and simplification.” Although specifics were largely absent, Clinton promised to deliver more details during a campaign appearance this Thursday in New Hampshire.

REGULATORY WORLD

U.K. Plans to Have 18 Percent Corporate Tax Rate by 2020. George Osborne, U.K. financial chief, announced that the corporate tax rate would go down to 19 percent in 2017, and to 18 percent by 2020. While Osborne announced other changes during the interim Summer 2015 budget speech, plans of lowering the corporate rate garnered the most attention. Commentators noted that the tax rate would be competitive with those offered in other countries like Switzerland (at 18 percent) and Hong Kong (at 16.5 percent). The 18 percent would make it the single lowest rate among G-20 countries, resulting in a 2-percent increase in foreign direct investment, said Michael Devereux, director of the Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.

IRS Adopts Wyden’s Request Regarding Financial Products. Last week, the IRS released Notice 2015-47 and Notice 2015-48, both intending to put an end to the use of “basket options” to change the characteristic of income from short-term capital gains and ordinary income into long-term gains. In March of this year, Wyden reported the abuse of “basket options” allowed hedge funds to invest in a collection of securities and control the investment strategy even though they are technically owned by the bank. The use of an option contract that references a basket of actively traded personal property, such as securities, where a taxpayer attempts to defer and treat ordinary income as long term capital gain would be treated as a listed transaction.

LOOKING AHEAD

House and Senate

  • Keep your eyes peeled for votes on the House highway bill (H.R. 3038) this week, and for announcements from the Senate about its own version of a funding bill.
  • We expect an announcement before the end of the week from the Senate Finance Committee noticing a mark-up of a straight two-year tax extender bill.