Trade mark registration denied because while the registration of an earlier identical mark had been revoked, the effective date of revocation was from the date of the application for revocation and there was still a residual period of validity of the revoked mark which would have overlapped with the period of validity of the applied for mark resulting in a period of time where two identical marks would have been on the trade mark register for the same class.
Register Now As you are not an existing subscriber please register for your free daily legal newsfeed service.Register
If you have any questions about the service please contact email@example.com or call Lexology Customer Services on +44 20 7234 0606.
Campomar SL v Nike International Ltd
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader.
If you are interested in submitting an article to Lexology, please contact Andrew Teague at firstname.lastname@example.org.
"Lexology is one of the few newsfeeds that I do actually look over as and when it comes in - the information is current; has good descriptive headings so I can see quickly what the articles relate to...
"Lexology is one of the few newsfeeds that I do actually look over as and when it comes in - the information is current; has good descriptive headings so I can see quickly what the articles relate to and is not too long."
Senior Legal Counsel, Bankwest Business
Bank of Western Australia Ltd