We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

A short story about a red bus on a monochrome background

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 26 2012

A recent decision of the English Patents Court involved a claim for copyright infringement relating to photographs used by the parties on the packaging of their respective products.

more related articles »

UK Patents County Court finds copyright subsists in digitally manipulated photograph

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 29 2012

In Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd 2012 EWPCC 1 (12 January 2012), Judge Birss QC found that an image belonging to New English Teas infringed the copyright subsisting in a digitally manipulated photograph of a London scene created by Temple Island Collections.

more related articles »

Question and answer: do I need permission to use a photograph of public domain art?

  • Heenan Blaikie LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 23 2011

Let's imagine someone wants to use a photograph of a very old painting in their movie or television show (or, what the heck, in a book) - under Canadian law, do they need permission from the photographer or other owner of the photograph?.

more related articles »

Author! Author! Can monkeys own copyrights in self-portraits?

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 2 2011

No, monkeys can’t own copyrights.

more related articles »

Snaps: Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas 2012 EWPCC 1

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 3 2012

A case causing somewhat of a stir in the world of copyright law at the moment is the recent Temple Islands case about photographs of a bright red routemaster bus.

more related articles »

Portrait photographs and copyright

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • December 15 2011

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has considered the breadth of copyright protection for portrait photographs including an assessment of the limitations to be applied in relation to criticism and review and public security.

more related articles »

Canada's new photography copyright regime: clearance challenges

  • Heenan Blaikie LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • December 3 2012

With the coming into force of many of the provisions of the Copyright Modernization Act (Bill C-11) on November 7, 2012, Canadian copyright law boasts a new regime with respect to photographs.

more related articles »

CJEU rules on copyright protection of photographic portraits

  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • -
  • European Union
  • -
  • February 29 2012

In Case C-14510 Eva-Maria Painer v Standard Verlags GmbH 1 December 2011, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that portrait photographs enjoy the same copyright protection as any other work.

more related articles »

Bill C-32 the Copyright Modernization Act

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • June 4 2010

After failed attempts in 2006 and 2008, the government tabled the Copyright Modernization Act (Bill C-32) in the House of Commons on June 2nd, 2010.

more related articles »

Canada’s copyright reform

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • September 20 2010

After failed attempts in 2006 and 2008, the government tabled the Copyright Modernization Act (Bill C-32) in the House of Commons in June of this year.

more related articles »

The Federal Court warns publishers not to hide behind authors in obtaining permission to publish copyright material

  • Holding Redlich
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 15 2013

A recent case in the Federal Court of Australia has cast light upon the importance of publishers obtaining proper permission prior to the publication

more related articles »

The Daily Copyright - business costs issue

  • Wragge & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 12 2012

What do the following have in common?

more related articles »

PIPEDA and filmingphotographing individuals for film and TV projects

  • Heenan Blaikie LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 15 2011

This article explores the interface between Canada's primary federal privacy legislation, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act ("PIPEDA"), and the activity of filming or photographing an individual where the resulting film or photograph is used in a motion picture or television project.

more related articles »

Bratz and Baby Buddies - clarifying the ideaexpression dichotomy

  • Heenan Blaikie LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • August 10 2010

The ideaexpression dichotomy is fundamental to copyright law, and can be stated with relative ease.

more related articles »