We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Bodum finds its glass half empty after rare federal court industrial design decision

SIM. IP Practice | Canada | November 14 2012

Summary Bodum’s industrial design registrations for double-walled drinking glasses have been held by the Federal Court to be invalid for lack of originality and not infringed by Trudeau’s drinking glasses sold since 2006.

more related articles »


Protection by design: industrial design law in Canada

Field Law | Canada | March 1 2013

Bodum - a maker of popular coffee-press and glass products - wanted to protect their design for a double-walled drinking glass in a competitive

more related articles »


Hen’s tooth found: Federal Court decides industrial design infringement case

Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP | Canada | November 16 2012

The Federal Court heard its first industrial design case in nearly two decades

more related articles »


Industrial designs enforcement seen through double glasses

Bennett Jones LLP | Canada | November 27 2012

Industrial design protection is an often overlooked form of protection that is a poor cousin of Copyright.

more related articles »


Don’t overlook industrial designs: part 2

Field Law | Canada | January 14 2013

As mentioned in our previous post, industrial designs protect the visual features of a product (shape, configuration, pattern or ornament)

more related articles »


Industrial designs

Marks & Clerk | Canada, USA | May 6 2014

In recent years, design protection has garnered interest for protecting the appearance of a product, particularly in view of high-profile cases

more related articles »


Bodum USA, Inc. and Pi Design AG v. Trudeau Corporation (1889) Inc

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Canada | November 28 2012

In this case, Bodum started an action against Trudeau for infringement of two Industrial Designs (IDs) relating to double wall glasses.

more related articles »


French press

Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP | Canada, USA | April 3 2013

Bodum USA Inc., and its associated companies (“Bodum”) manufacture and distribute housewares. Bodum owns a Canadian trade mark registration for the

more related articles »


Vulnerabilities of descriptive marks

Field Law | Canada | October 30 2013

A trade-mark must be distinctive - if it is not, it is at risk of being unregistrable, and if for some reason it is registered, it is vulnerable to

more related articles »


Defendants avoid oily mess in patent and design infringement case

SIM. IP Practice | Canada | August 2 2013

On June 7, 2013, the Federal Court of Canada delivered its decision in the case of Zero Spill Systems, in which Zero Spill Systems claimed

more related articles »


Bodum: Appeal Court affirms trademark distinctions analysis

Clark Wilson LLP | Canada | October 25 2013

An earlier blog commented on the Federal Court's decision in Bodum USA, Inc. v. Meyer Housewares Canada Inc. Bodum commenced an action for

more related articles »


Federal Court invalidates selection patent for lack of sound prediction PLAVIX (clopidogrel)

Norton Rose Fulbright LLP | Canada | January 9 2012

On December 6, 2011, the Federal Court (per Boivin J.) held in a 247-page decision that sanofi-aventis’s patent for clopidogrel bisulfate (PLAVIX) is invalid because the inventors failed to disclose the factual basis and line of reasoning for their sound prediction of utility in the specification.

more related articles »


Federal Court declares clopidogrel patent invalid for lack of utilitysound prediction

Heenan Blaikie LLP | Canada | March 27 2012

The Federal Court of Canada recently issued a decision (2011 FC 1486) concerning the drug Plavix, known generically as clopidogrel bisulfate.

more related articles »


Canada

Clancy PC + Brion Raffoul | Canada | December 11 2014

In Canada, industrial designs are regulated under the Industrial Design Act, as well as the Industrial Design Regulations. In terms of international

more related articles »


Federal Court invalidates Sanofi’s Plavix patent for alleged insufficiency and obviousness

Bereskin & Parr LLP | Canada | January 12 2012

On December 6, 2011, the Federal Court of Canada issued its decision in the well-known dispute between Apotex Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis over the anticoagulant drug, clopidogrel bisulfate, sold in Canada under the brand name Plavix.

more related articles »


Expungement of "FRENCH PRESS" Trade-mark upheld by Federal Court of Appeal

Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP | Canada | November 11 2013

In Bodum USA, Inc. v Meyer Housewares Canada Inc., 2013 FCA 240, the Federal Court of Appeal recently upheld a decision of the Federal Court to

more related articles »


Trade-mark expunged as not distinctive and clearly descriptive

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Canada | December 17 2012

Bodum sued for inter alia, infringement of its “FRENCH PRESS” trade-mark, and Meyer counterclaimed for invalidity. The Court held that the trade-mark

more related articles »


Key developments in Canadian patent law in 2011

Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP | Canada | January 31 2012

The following article summarizes several developments in Canadian patent law, including a brief summary of amendments to the Patent Rules.

more related articles »


Infringement of industrial designs

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP | Canada | September 17 2008

A recent decision of the Superior Court of the Province of Québec decided that the defendant had infringed the plaintiff's industrial design.

more related articles »