We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

SIM. IP Practice

Offices

  1. Canada

    1. Toronto ON

      330 University Avenue, 6th Floor, Toronto ON M5G 1R7, Canada T 1 416 595 1155 F 1 416 595 1163 W
  1. The Federal Court warns against using sound prediction as a “crushing hammer”

    Canada - March 25 2013

    The Federal Court has arguably pleased the patentee side of the fence in its recent decision finding that Novartis’ tumour drug patent had the

  2. Is the Patented Medicines Prices Review Board (“PMPRB”) extending itself beyond actual “patentees” and “patented medicines”?

    Canada - September 14 2012

    The blurring of “brand” and “generic” has arguably grown over the past few years as companies develop strategies to take advantage of the best of both worlds

  3. FCA finds possible estoppel once again Apotex may be bound by earlier foreign and Canadian findings

    Canada - March 28 2012

    The Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) recently agreed that AstraZeneca is permitted, as part of its claim for patent infringement, to plead that Apotex is bound by prior decisions finding infringement

  4. Pfizer kicked when down: Federal Court provides added certainty that VIAGRA patent is now invalid and void

    Canada - November 22 2012

    The Federal Court has followed the lead of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) and declared the VIAGRA patent “invalid” and “void”

  5. Eli Lilly olanzapine appeal dismissed from bench

    Canada - September 17 2012

    From the bench, the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) dismissed Eli Lilly’s appeal from the decision of Justice O’Reilly on November 10, 2011

  1. The Federal Court warns against using sound prediction as a “crushing hammer”

    Canada - March 25 2013

    The Federal Court has arguably pleased the patentee side of the fence in its recent decision finding that Novartis’ tumour drug patent had the

  2. “Computer problems” solved by Canadian Patent Office?

    Canada - March 21 2013

    On March 8, 2013, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) issued a new Practice Notice (PN2013-03) to all Canadian Patent Examiners with

  3. Bill C-56 aims to introduce new provisions in the Trade-marks Act

    Canada - March 15 2013

    On March 1, 2013, the Canadian government introduced Bill C-56, titled the Combating Counterfeit Products Act (the "Bill"), which proposes to

  4. A Canadian perspective on purposive construction: solving a problem with an interesting solution

    Canada - March 11 2013

    On March 8, 2013, the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) issued a new Practice Notice (PN2013-02) to all Canadian Patent Examiners

  5. Federal Court of Appeal finds 50 year old drug not an innovative drug

    Canada - March 6 2013

    The Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) in a split decision denied Celgene’s request to have its “new” thalidomide drug product designated as an