We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Barger & Wolen LLP

Offices

  1. USA

    1. Irvine

      19800 MacArthur Blvd Suite 800, 8th Floor, Irvine CA 92612 2427, USA T 1 949 757 2800 F 1 949 752 6313
    2. Los Angeles CA Barger & Wolen

      633 West Fifth Street, 47th Floor, Los Angeles CA 90071-2205, USA T 1 213 680 2800 F 1 213 614 7399
  1. Attorney fees not available in mixed motive retaliation claims under Title VII, Seventh Circuit rules

    USA - May 6 2013

    Under Title VII, in "mixed motive" discrimination cases (i.e., discrimination motivated in part, but not entirely, by an impermissible factor), an

  2. Recent regulatory rulings may provide leverage for insurers

    USA - May 9 2013

    As recently reported in this blog post, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Gregory Alarcon invalidated the California Department of Insurance's

  3. Liability insurers may have duty to defend against federal prosecutions, California Court of Appeal holds

    USA - May 6 2013

    The Second Appellate District of California held on May 1 in Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. Lopez that California Insurance Code section 533.5(b) does not

  4. California Supreme Court hears argument on whether Insurance Code limits UCL lawsuits against insurers

    USA - May 10 2013

    On May 8, 2013, the California Supreme Court convened to hear oral argument in Zhang v. Superior Court. The case presents the issue of whether

  5. Court of Appeal applies Howell rule to future medical expenses and noneconomic damages

    USA - May 3 2013

    In Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc., the California Supreme Court ruled that where a plaintiff's medical care provider, pursuant to a

  1. Last minute amendment by counsel to augment fee claim rejected by court

    USA - May 15 2013

    In Duchrow v. Forrest, 2013 DJAR 5534 (2013) the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District decided a unique fee claim arising in a

  2. Sanctions are issued where court determines that special motion to strike was filed for improper purpose

    USA - May 14 2013

    In Kleveland v. Siegel & Wolensky LLP, 2013 DAR 4961(2013) the California Courts of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District affirmed the denial of a

  3. California Supreme Court hears argument on whether Insurance Code limits UCL lawsuits against insurers

    USA - May 10 2013

    On May 8, 2013, the California Supreme Court convened to hear oral argument in Zhang v. Superior Court. The case presents the issue of whether

  4. Recent regulatory rulings may provide leverage for insurers

    USA - May 9 2013

    As recently reported in this blog post, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Gregory Alarcon invalidated the California Department of Insurance's

  5. Attorney fees not available in mixed motive retaliation claims under Title VII, Seventh Circuit rules

    USA - May 6 2013

    Under Title VII, in "mixed motive" discrimination cases (i.e., discrimination motivated in part, but not entirely, by an impermissible factor), an