We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Barry.Nilsson. Lawyers

Offices

  1. Australia

    1. Brisbane QLD

      215 Adelaide Street, Level 21, Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia T 61 7 3231 6300
  1. The high price of providing unnecessary medical treatment - Dean v Phung 2012 NSWCA 223

    Australia - October 11 2012

    The New South Wales Court of Appeal recently considered one set of circumstances that took the assessment of damages for a personal injuries claim arising out of medical treatment outside the scope of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) (the Act

  2. High Court delivers its first decision on proportionate liability

    Australia - April 30 2013

    The High Court has delivered its first judgement on proportionate liability. The judgment is generally good news for insurers as it takes a broad

  3. Exaggerated personal injuries leads to a contempt of court charge

    Australia, United Kingdom - April 3 2013

    In the recent English decision of Airbus Operations Ltd & Anor v Roberts 2012 EWHC 3631, the defendant, Mr Roberts, was found to be in contempt of

  4. No escape for medical centres in follow up cases

    Australia - April 4 2013

    A recent decision of the NSW Court of Appeal1 shows that medical centres providing premises and administrative services to doctors may be liable for

  5. The future of financial advice will reforms have any impact on claims?

    Australia - April 3 2013

    In the wake of the global financial crisis, and following several well publicised financial advice disasters, the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA

  1. High Court delivers its first decision on proportionate liability

    Australia - April 30 2013

    The High Court has delivered its first judgement on proportionate liability. The judgment is generally good news for insurers as it takes a broad

  2. Health related mobile applications - buyer beware or liability minefield

    Australia - April 4 2013

    The phenomenon of prospective patients consulting Dr Google as well as (and perhaps sometimes instead of) their local GP is well known. Patients are

  3. No escape for medical centres in follow up cases

    Australia - April 4 2013

    A recent decision of the NSW Court of Appeal1 shows that medical centres providing premises and administrative services to doctors may be liable for

  4. Idamaneo v Gross - how effective are indemnity clauses in doctor's contracts?

    Australia - April 4 2013

    The judgement of the NSW Court of Appeal in Idameneo v Gross1 dealt with some tricky contractual issues that can arise out of the now common

  5. Inadequate staffing exposes health care practices to liability claims

    Australia - April 4 2013

    Health practitioners and especially those working in hospitals will at some point be required to work through an emergency situation when faced with