Thomas J. McCormack Chadbourne & Parke LLP
Results 1 to 5 of 12
Shareholder derivative action against Wells Fargo’s directors survives motion to dismiss *
USA - June 5 2012
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently denied the motion of Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) to dismiss claims that its directors and officers breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders during the mortgage crisis.
Co-authors: Jill Kahn.
Insurer prevails on fraud claim in mortgage securitization action against Countrywide *
USA - March 1 2012
A New York trial court recently granted partial summary judgment in favor of MBIA Insurance Corporation (“MBIA”) on fraud and breach of warranty claims it had brought against Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and various affiliates (collectively, “Countrywide”) concerning certain financial guaranty insurance policies that MBIA had issued in connection with residential mortgage-backed securitizations originated by Countrywide.
Co-authors: Robert M. Kirby.
The Edge Act keeps AIG’s suit against Bank of America in federal court *
USA - December 1 2011
A recent decision by a New York federal district court upheld federal court jurisdiction under the Edge Act, 12 U.S.C.§ 632 (the “Edge Act”), in a lawsuit brought by American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”) and several other insurers against Bank of America, Merrill Lynch and Countrywide Affiliates
Co-authors: Jill Kahn.
Securities fraud claims arising from Lehman collapse survive dismissal *
USA - September 13 2011
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss federal securities law claims brought on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of securities issued by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman”) prior to its September 2008 collapse.
Co-authors: Robert M. Kirby.
U.S. Supreme Court reverses U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, holding plaintiffs cannot bring federal common-law claims for greenhouse gas emissions *
USA - June 24 2011
On June 20, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court, in an 8-0 decision, held that federal public nuisance claims seeking to enjoin the emission of “greenhouse” gases are barred (or, in the Court’s language, “displace[d]”) by the provisions of the federal Clean Air Act (the “Act”) and the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) regulatory authority over greenhouse gases.
Co-authors: Mary T. Yelenick, Andrew A. Giaccia.
Co-authors of Thomas J. McCormack
Other Chadbourne & Parke LLP authors
- Abbe David Lowell,
- Ariel Meyerstein,
- Carlos Martínez,
- Christina G. Hioureas,
- Christy L. Rivera,
- Dana Frix ,
- Daniel A. Rabinowitz,
- Eric Daucher,
- Francisco Vazquez,
- Garrett Lynam ,
- Kevin C. Smith ,
- Marc A. Alpert,
- Mark D. Beckett,
- Michaela Cohen,
- Morton E. Grosz,
- Oliver J. Armas,
- Scott W. Naidech,
- Sean P. McGuinness,
- Sey-Hyo Lee,
- Susan Cowell
