We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Rosie Patterson Herbert Smith Freehills LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 9



The CJEU opens the door for SPCs for new medical uses of known compounds *

United Kingdom - July 20 2012
Yesterday the CJEU handed down its decision in the eagerly awaited reference Neurim Pharmaceuticals v The Comptroller General of Patents concerning the possibility of obtaining an SPC based on a marketing authorisation ("MA"), where there has been an earlier MA for the same product but for a different use.

Co-authors: Sebastian Moore.


SPC grant possible despite the existence of an earlier MA for a different medicinal product with the same active ingredient *

European Union - May 3 2012
Advocate General Trstenjak has today handed down her Opinion in Neurim Pharmaceuticals v The Comptroller-General of Patents, a reference concerning the possibility of obtaining SPC protection relying on a marketing authorisation ("MA") where an earlier MA has already been granted for the same active ingredient.

Co-authors: Sebastian Moore.


Patentability of stem cells: the Brüstle decision *

European Union - October 19 2011
On 18 October 2011 the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") handed down a much anticipated judgment in Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace e.V. on the patentability of inventions relating to stem cells.

Co-authors: Sebastian Moore.


Interflora - the sweet smell of success, or a muted victory for trademark owners? *

European Union, United Kingdom - September 26 2011
In Interflora v Marks & Spencer, the Court of Justice ("CJEU") has provided some clarification on the scope of trade mark protection where a competitor uses a registered mark as a keyword.

Co-authors: Joel Smith.


Marketing prior to Directive 65/65 authorisation precludes SPC, rules the ECJ *

European Union, United Kingdom - August 1 2011
On 28 July the ECJ handed down two rulings primarily concerning the interpretation of Article 2 of Regulation 1768/92 (the Supplementary Protection Certificate Regulation, now replaced by 469/2009/EC).

Co-authors: Jonathan Turnbull, Sebastian Moore.


Next »