We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Mark C. Dosker Squire Sanders

Results 1 to 5 of 7



US Supreme Court reinforces “rigorous analysis” of class certification requirements in Comcast ruling *

USA - April 4 2013
Following on the heels of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S. __ (2011), the US Supreme Court's recent 5-4 decision in Comcast Corp. v. Behrend…

Co-authors: Amy L. Brown, Patricia E. Lowry, Philip M. Oliss .


Banks, credit unions and payday lending examinations and investigations *

United Kingdom, USA - July 12 2012
Banks, credit unions and other consumer lenders that offer short-term loans and financial products (or payday-like loans) should take notice.

Co-authors: Traci H. Rollins , Pierre H. Bergeron, Martha S. Sullivan, Brian A. Cabianca , Abby E. Brown.


The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and payday lending examinations *

USA - May 31 2012
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), created under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, has made payday lending a regulatory priority for 2012.

Co-authors: Amy Bloom , Traci H. Rollins , Pierre H. Bergeron, Martha S. Sullivan, Brian A. Cabianca .


US Supreme Court rejects proposed class based on “corporate culture of bias” and statistical evidence; gives teeth to commonality requirement of Rule 23(a)(2) *

USA - June 21 2011
On June 20, 2011 the US Supreme Court unanimously held in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, et al., 564 U.S. ___ (2011), that 1.5 million current and former female employees of Wal-Mart could not proceed as a class in their claims for employment discrimination.

Co-authors: Amy L. Brown, Jill S. Kirila, David Goodman.


Supreme Court opens the door to enforcing class action waivers and bars in arbitration agreements – today’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion *

USA - April 27 2011
Today, the United States Supreme Court held in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. __ (2011), by a 5-4 majority, that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) prohibits states from conditioning the enforceability of arbitration agreements on the availability of class arbitration.

Co-authors: Jill S. Kirila, Pierre H. Bergeron, Alexandra A. Bodnar, Abby E. Brown.


Next »