We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

William T. Barker Dentons

Results 1 to 1 of 1



Seventh Circuit holds that where policy language was not clear, insurer had duty to defend even though SIR was not exhausted; denial of defense was vexatious *

USA - June 14 2012
Ordinarily, when a liability policy has a self-insured retention ("SIR"), the insurer's duty to defend does not attach until the SIR is exhausted.