We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Daniel V. Johns Ballard Spahr LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 21



Eighth Circuit upholds employment agreement waiving collective action rights *

USA - January 15 2013
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has joined the clear majority of federal district courts in concluding that employment arbitration…

Co-authors: Erin K. Clarke, Steven W. Suflas.


D.C. Circuit upholds NLRB requirement that employer give union sensitive information *

USA - December 6 2012
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently upheld a controversial National Labor Relations Board ruling that required an employer to provide a union with sensitive information about customers and pricing.

Co-authors: Mary Cate Gordon.


NLRB expands employers’ duty to respond to union requests for “presumptively relevant” information *

USA - November 12 2012
A National Labor Relations Board panel recently found that an employer has a good-faith duty under the National Labor Relations Act to respond in a reasonably timely manner to a union request for “presumptively relevant” information – even when the employer believes it may have actual grounds for not providing that information.

Co-authors: Alexandra Bak-Boychuk .


NLRB provides guidance on at-will employment disclaimers *

USA - November 8 2012
At-will employment clauses in two employee handbooks did not violate employees’ rights under the National Labor Relations Act, according to advice memoranda issued last week by the National Labor Relations Board’s Acting General Counsel (AGC).

Co-authors: Rebecca L. Massimini .


Third Circuit establishes joint employment test under FLSA *

USA - July 2 2012
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit late last week considered the broad definition of “employer” under the Fair Labor Standards Act to determine when two employers jointly employ an employee, an issue that has been arising with increasing frequency as plaintiffs’ lawyers seek to file sweeping collective actions encompassing parent corporations, subsidiaries, and affiliated entities.

Co-authors: Kelly T. Kindig.


Next »