We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Robert G. Young Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 10



"Oh, yeah? Then prove it!” – First Circuit case provides another example of the perils of inadequate employment recordkeeping *

USA - September 17 2012
As all employers know, there are numerous reasons why it is critical to keep accurate records of employees’ hours worked, particularly for non-exempt employees.

Co-authors: Timothy P. Van Dyck.


Congressional Update: Healthcare / immigration / Citizens United / transportation / cybersecurity / "future of video" *

USA - June 29 2012
In the most widely anticipated Supreme Court Decision since Bush v. Gore in 2000, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, President Obama's signature legislative achievement, was upheld in a narrow 5 to 4 decision.

Co-authors: Mark R. Heilbrun, Seth A. Davidson, Mark A. Huddle, Isaac Brown, Jason L. Zanetti .


Is this really Fair (Credit Reporting Act)? *

USA - June 21 2012
On June 12, 2012, the Federal Trade Commission announced that Spokeo, Inc. had agreed to settle charges that it compiled and sold detailed personal profiles of individuals to various employers, recruiters and other background screening groups without observing procedures required under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

Co-authors: Mark E. Schreiber.


New regulations under the Americans with Disabilities Act affects ATMs *

USA - April 9 2012
On September 15, 2010, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) issued a final rule amending the regulations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) that govern automated teller machines (“ATMs”).

Co-authors: Eric B. Mack.


Employers beware: if the employment relationship changes, that non-compete agreement may be void *

USA - March 7 2012
A Massachusetts Superior Court recently decided that material changes in the employment relationships between a company and two of its employees rendered previously-executed noncompetition agreements void and therefore denied the company’s request to enforce the agreements.

Co-authors: Timothy P. Van Dyck.


Next »