We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Gregory D. Pendleton Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 21



The Supreme Court of Washington holds that an insurer cannot recoup defense costs after defending under a reservation of rights, notwithstanding a determination that there is no coverage *

USA - March 12 2013
On March 7, 2013, Washington State's highest court dealt a blow to liability insurers seeking to recover defense costs for uncovered claims. The…


California court finds for insurer in service fee case *

USA - December 21 2012
The California Court of Appeal recently affirmed dismissal of a class action suit alleging that an insurer had unlawfully charged service fees to policyholders who paid for their insurance in monthly installments. 


Shareholder derivative litigation: a primer for insurance coverage counsel *

USA - December 20 2012
The recent spate of mergers, acquisitions, leveraged dividends and regulatory investigations has led to a much higher frequency of shareholder derivative…

Co-authors: John D. Hughes, Jonathan Toren.


Coverage issues implicated by FDIC claims against directors and officers of failed banks *

USA - September 7 2012
The financial crisis commencing in 2008 has led to the failure of an unprecedented number of financial institutions.

Co-authors: Joshua P. Broudy .


New York adopts Delaware’s “Tooley Test” for distinguishing between derivative and direct actions *

USA - August 13 2012
The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, issued a ruling this past week in which it adopted a “clear approach” for determining the difference between direct and derivative claims. 


Next »