We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Malcolm N. Ruby Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP

Results 1 to 3 of 3



A medical device has its day in court – Andersen v. St. Jude Medical *

Canada - July 11 2012
On June 26, 2012, the Ontario Superior Court released its much-anticipated decision in Andersen et al. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al.

Co-authors: Alan West, Nicholas Kluge , Evan Atwood , Mary M. Thomson .


Supreme Court simplifies and clarifies assumption of personal jurisdiction *

Canada - April 30 2012
For twenty-two years, since the leading decision in Morguard Investments Ltd. v. De Savoye, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1077, the ‘real and substantial connection’ test has been the judicial guide to the proper assumption of jurisdiction in conflict of laws cases.

Co-authors: Evan Atwood .


Arbitration or class action? Supreme Court of Canada deals with enforceability of arbitration clause in consumer contract *

Canada - December 14 2011
Counsel, consumers, and business owners should know that clear statutory language in consumer protection statutes can limit or curtail contractual freedom to choose arbitration.