We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Kenneth G. Parker Haynes and Boone LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 5



Nuggets in the ashes: a few guideposts unearthed from CLS Bank v. Alice Corporation *

USA - May 16 2013
The Federal Circuit released the results of its en banc hearing of a case involving the issue of what is patentable eligible subject matter under…

Co-authors: Richard D. Rochford, Michael M. Shen.


Valuable IP lessons from the $8.1 million Mixed Chicks trademark and trade dress victory *

USA - January 24 2013
On November 2, 2012, a California jury returned an $8.1 million verdict in favor of Mixed Chicks, LLC against Sally Beauty Supply LLC. The jury found…


CLS Bank and Bancorp: back to back Federal Circuit decisions offer different conclusions on patentability *

USA - August 2 2012
The issue of whether particular inventions include "patent eligible" subject matter under § 101 of the patent statute has become highly controversial in recent years, raising questions with high economic stakes and profound legal and philosophical implications.

Co-authors: Phillip B. Philbin, David Harper.


Intervening rights and invalidity-argument estoppel in litigation after patent reexamination *

USA - October 19 2011
The Federal Circuit recently resolved two issues of first impression as to how patent reexamination proceedings affect related patent infringement litigation

Co-authors: David M. O'Dell, Don Tiller.


The status quo wins: clear and convincing proof is still required to invalidate patent claims *

USA - June 13 2011
The Supreme Court ruled last week in Microsoft Corporation v. i4i Limited Partnership that “clear and convincing evidence” is still the standard of proof required to invalidate a patent.

Co-authors: Phillip B. Philbin, Kyle Musgrove, Steve Levitan, David Harper.