We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Eric L. Sussman Day Pitney LLP

Results 1 to 3 of 3



Second Circuit clarifies standard for proving whistleblower retaliation claims *

USA - March 7 2013
The Second Circuit clarified the burden-shifting framework applicable to whistleblower retaliation claims under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ("SOX")…


Connecticut bill prohibiting discrimination against unemployed job seekers advances to State Senate *

USA - April 25 2012
On April 17, 2012, the Connecticut General Assembly’s Judiciary Committee voted in favor of a bill that would prohibit employers from advertising employment opportunities in a way that discriminates against any job seekers because they are unemployed. 


Supreme Court holds that "cat's paw" can create liability for employers *

USA - March 4 2011
On March 1, 2011, the United States Supreme Court held in Staub v. Proctor Hospital, No. 09-400, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 1900 (Mar. 1, 2011), that an employer can be held liable for discrimination where an adverse employment decision is influenced by a supervisor's discriminatory intent, even where the ultimate decision maker had no discriminatory animus.

Co-authors: Daniel L. Schwartz.