We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Ian W. Siminoff Fox Rothschild LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 7



New Jersey Supreme Court holds that “willful” OSHA violation does not remove cloak of protection provided to employers by Workers’ Compensation Act *

USA - July 11 2012
On June 26, 2012, in Van Dunk v. Reckson Associates Realty Corp., the New Jersey Supreme Court reaffirmed the “formidable” hurdle employees need to jump over before an employer can be held liable in tort for an employee’s workplace injury.


New Jersey adopts Federal white collar exemptions *

USA - September 14 2011
Under both New Jersey (NJ) and Federal law, unless exempt, employees who work more than forty (40) hours in a given week are required to be paid at least one-and-a-half times their regular hourly rate.

Co-authors: Mark Tabakman.


New Jersey Supreme Court says resigning whistleblowers can recover lost wages in the absence of constructive discharge *

USA - June 18 2011
Earlier this month, in Donelson v. DuPont Chambers Works, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that where an employee is rendered psychologically disabled as a result of retaliation for engaging in whistleblowing activity, he can recover lost wages, without having to prove constructive discharge.


New law makes it more difficult for discharged NJ employees to collect unemployment benefits *

USA - December 9 2010
In an effort to ease the tax burden on businesses while reducing the shortfall in New Jersey's unemployment insurance fund, Governor Christie recently enacted a new law that, in pertinent part, changes the way misconduct is defined in the unemployment compensation context.


New Jersey Supreme Court: effect of time-barred discriminatory pay decisions can constitute timely, actionable wrongs *

USA - December 1 2010
In Alexander v Seton Hall University (A-87-09), 11/23/10, the New Jersey Supreme Court addressed the question of whether a plaintiff can — where a discriminatory pay decision is made outside the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination's (LAD) two-year limitations period — make out a timely claim under the LAD by arguing the discriminatory pay decision resulted in the payment of unequal wages during the two-year limitations period.


Next »