We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Michele C. Maman Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 7



Court holds that Stockton is eligible to file for chapter 9 *

USA - April 3 2013
On April 1, 2013, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California ruled that the City of Stockton qualified to file for protection…

Co-authors: John J. Rapisardi, Lary Stromfeld , Mark C. Ellenberg, Thomas Curtin .


In re Hostess Brands, Inc.: Southern District of New York Bankruptcy Court refuses to send cash collateral dispute to arbitration *

USA - February 4 2013
On January 7, 2013, the Judge Robert D. Drain of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held that a dispute…

Co-authors: Michael A. Stevens.


KB toys: Delaware Bankruptcy Court weighs in on claims trading *

USA - June 11 2012
On May 4, 2012 Judge Kevin J. Carey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware held that a claim against a debtor’s estate, transferred to a third party, is subject to the same infirmities as in the hands of the original holder of the claim.

Co-authors: Andrew M. Greenberg , Zachary Smith.


Delaware’s not so safe harbors: Third Circuit Bankruptcy Court declines to rule that a payment on a letter of credit is an avoidance-proof “settlement payment” *

USA - April 17 2012
On March 26, 2012, Judge Mary F. Walrath of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware refused to rule that, as a matter of law, payments made to satisfy a debtor’s obligations under a letter of credit constitute “settlement payments” protected from avoidance under section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Co-authors: Casey Servais, Mark C. Ellenberg, Peter M. Friedman, Douglas S. Mintz.


Third Circuit upholds use of discounted cash flow method under Bankruptcy Code Section 562 in In re American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc., et al. *

USA - March 2 2011
On February 16, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that a discounted cash flow analysis constituted "a commercially reasonable determinant[] of value" for purposes of section 562(a) of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

Co-authors: Mark C. Ellenberg, Douglas S. Mintz.


Next »