We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Louis M. Solomon Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 37



Norex decision, long in federal court, now dismissed by state court using borrowing statute to shorten applicable limitations period *

USA - October 24 2012
We have posted on the meanderings of the Norex case in federal court (e.g., here). 


Court denies non-U.S. company’s attempt to avoid default, citing agency relationship between parent and sub justifying earlier exercise of jurisdiction over non-U.S. parent *

USA - September 4 2012
The drywall litigation, arising from the installation into U.S. homes of allegedly defective drywall from China, has included a great many noteworthy international practice issues.


Topics and trends in international litigation *

USA - September 4 2012
The drywall litigation, arising from the installation into U.S. homes of allegedly defective drywall from China, has included a great many noteworthy international practice issues.


New York’s highest court interprets both state and federal antitrust law and limits extraterritorial application *

USA - August 24 2012
Global Reinsurance Corp. v. Equitas Ltd., No. 53 (NY Ct. App. 2012), addresses the sufficiency and, more pertinent for our purposes, the extra-territorial reach of antitrust claims under New York’s antitrust statute, the Donnelly Act (NY Gen Bus. Law sec. 340, et seq.).


Ninth Circuit reverses FSIA exception; no commercial activity in the U.S. in Iraq’s Oil For Food Program *

USA - August 21 2012
Terenkian v. Republic of Iraq, No. 10-56708 (9th Cir. 2012), addresses the important international practice question of whether activity by a non-U.S. sovereign satisfies the “commericial activity” exclusion to the application of the Foreign Sovereign Immunicties Act, thus permiting the federal courts to excercise subject matter jurisdiction over a matter.


Next »