We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Shelly Freeman Lathrop & Gage LLP

Results 1 to 4 of 4



U.S. Supreme Court recognizes potential liability for Cat’s Paw discrimination *

USA - April 28 2011
Even if an upper level, ultimate decision maker bears no discriminatory motive, where the underpinnings of that decision are sufficiently tainted by lower level supervisors' discriminatory intent, the Company will be held liable.

Co-authors: Shelley I. Ericsson, David C. Vogel.


Supreme Court finds employee’s oral complaint protected under FLSA *

USA - April 20 2011
If an employee makes an oral complaint about an employer's pay or time-keeping practices, but never puts the complaint in writing, can the employee take advantage of the Fair Labor Standards Act's anti-retaliation provision?

Co-authors: David C. Vogel, Clay V. Fulghum.


U.S. Supreme Court extends Title VII’s retaliation protections to employees “closely associated” with a complaining party *

USA - February 4 2011
In yet another expansion of the scope of retaliation protections under Title VII1 , on January 24, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that an employee who is a “close associate” of another employee who files a discrimination claim may sue the employer for retaliation.

Co-authors: David C. Vogel, Chari J. Young.


FTC’s first investigation of the new FTC Endorsement Guides *

USA - June 10 2010
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently completed its first investigation of an alleged violation under its Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising ("Endorsement Guides").

Co-authors: Rosalee M. McNamara.