We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Tham Hsu Hsien Allen & Gledhill LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 18



English High Court considers implied duty for commercial parties in finance contract to exercise contractual discretion honestly and in good faith *

United Kingdom - December 20 2012
In SNCB Holding v UBS AG, the English High Court considered the question of the extent to which a commercial party conferred with discretion under a…

Co-authors: Kenneth Lim.


Singapore Court of Appeal holds common law tortious claims precluded by scheme of arrangement *

Singapore - March 8 2012
In SAAG Oilfield (S) Pte Ltd (formerly known as Derrick Services Singapore Pte Ltd) v Shaik Abu Bakar bin Abdul Sukol & Anor and another appeal, the Singapore Court of Appeal held that the respondents were precluded from pursuing their common law tortious claims for damages against the appeallant by virtue of a scheme of compromise and arrangement approved under the Companies Act (the "CA").

Co-authors: Kenneth Lim.


Singapore High Court considers principles and restrictions relating to director's right of inspection of company accounts *

Singapore - June 30 2011
In the recent decision of Hau Tau Khang v Sanur Indonesian Restaurant Pte Ltd & Anor and Another Matter, Steven Chong J in the Singapore High Court considered the principles and restrictions relating to the right of a director to inspect company accounts pursuant to section 199(3) of the Companies Act (the "CA").

Co-authors: Loong Tse Chuan.


English Court of Appeal considers extent of a creditor’s duty of disclosure to surety *

Singapore - April 28 2011
The English Court of Appeal in North Shore Ventures Ltd v Anstead Holdings Inc & Anor considered, inter alia, the extent of the duty of disclosure owed by a creditor to a surety or guarantor.

Co-authors: Kenneth Lim.


Singapore Court of Appeal stays action on ground of forum non conveniens and finds Indonesia the more appropriate forum *

Indonesia, Singapore - March 29 2011
The Singapore Court of Appeal in JIO Minerals FZC & Ors v Mineral Enterprises Ltd applied the two-stage test set out in the seminal House of Lords decision, Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460 (the "Spiliada"), in determining that Indonesia was the more appropriate forum for the parties' dispute.

Co-authors: Kristy Tan.


Next »