We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Kenneth Lim Allen & Gledhill LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 11



English High Court considers implied duty for commercial parties in finance contract to exercise contractual discretion honestly and in good faith *

United Kingdom - December 20 2012
In SNCB Holding v UBS AG, the English High Court considered the question of the extent to which a commercial party conferred with discretion under a…

Co-authors: Tham Hsu Hsien.


English Court of Appeal holds agreement to negotiate in good faith unenforceable *

United Kingdom - August 30 2012
The English Court of Appeal in Barbudev v Eurocom Cable Management Bulgaria Eood & Ors ("Barbudev") affirmed that a contract between two parties to negotiate in good faith the terms of another agreement is not enforceable in law.

Co-authors: Ramesh Selvaraj.


English High Court finds that shadow director need not have influence or control over all board decisions or all directors, and may owe duties with regard to specific matters instructed or influenced by him *

United Kingdom - May 31 2012
The decision of the English High Court in Mckillen v Misland (Cyprus) Investments Ltd & Ors may be of interest to investors and shareholders in companies who may not hold a formal appointment as a director of the company but nonetheless exercise influence over the company's affairs or certain aspects thereof.

Co-authors: Tan Xeauwei.


UK Supreme Court considers interpretation of "knowlege" in Limitation Act *

United Kingdom - May 31 2012
The case of Ministry of Defence v AB & Ors involved a substantive claim concerning personal injury.

Co-authors: Tay Yong Seng.


Singapore Court of Appeal holds common law tortious claims precluded by scheme of arrangement *

Singapore - March 8 2012
In SAAG Oilfield (S) Pte Ltd (formerly known as Derrick Services Singapore Pte Ltd) v Shaik Abu Bakar bin Abdul Sukol & Anor and another appeal, the Singapore Court of Appeal held that the respondents were precluded from pursuing their common law tortious claims for damages against the appeallant by virtue of a scheme of compromise and arrangement approved under the Companies Act (the "CA").

Co-authors: Tham Hsu Hsien.


Next »