We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Matthew Hank Littler Mendelson

Results 1 to 5 of 11



Eighth Circuit holds plaintiffs must provide evidence of actual damages even when employer doesn't keep accurate time records *

USA - April 29 2013
In Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed the standard of proof in a wage and hour case…


Fourth Circuit joins courts limiting employers' use of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to prosecute disloyal employees *

USA - August 6 2012
The federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) allows an employer to bring a civil action against an employee who accesses the employer's computers "without authorization" or in a manner that "exceeds authorized access."

Co-authors: Nina K. Markey.


Fourth Circuit joins courts limiting use of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to prosecute disloyal employee *

USA - August 2 2012
Although the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act is primarily a criminal statute designed to combat hacking, it allows an employer to bring a civil action against an employee who accesses the employer’s computers “without authorization” or in a manner that “exceeds authorized access”.


The Third Circuit sets forth new test for joint-employer status under the FLSA *

USA - July 12 2012
The Third Circuit recently elaborated on the test for joint-employer status under the Fair Labor Standards Act in the context of a parent company providing shared services to its subsidiaries in In re: Enterprise Rent-a-Car Wage & Hour Employment Practices Litigation, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13229 (3d Cir. June 28, 2012).

Co-authors: Martha J. Keon.


Michigan Federal Court limits use of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to prosecute disloyal employee *

USA - June 12 2012
The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act prohibits (among other things) an employee from accessing an employer’s computers “without authorization” or in a manner that “exceeds authorized access.” 


Next »