We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Marina Burton Blickley Venable LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 7



The Cyberlock decision: District Court rules that non-specific teaming agreements are unenforceable *

USA - May 14 2013
Government contractors will want to review their teaming agreements following the recent decision in Cyberlock Consulting, Inc. v. Info. Experts, Inc…

Co-authors: Keir X. Bancroft, James Y. Boland, Rebecca E. Pearson.


Virginia Supreme Court recognizes the evolving nature of non-compete law *

USA - November 8 2011
On November 4, 2011, the Virginia Supreme Court issued its opinion in one of the two non-compete cases it agreed to hear this term.

Co-authors: Linda M. Jackson .


Back to basics – SDNY says non-competes are not retention agreements *

USA - March 22 2011
Corporate counsel and human resource professionals may want to take a fresh look at their non-compete programs and the enforceability of their non-compete agreements - particularly as to high level executives.

Co-authors: Linda M. Jackson .


U.S. Supreme Court allows claim of third-party retaliation under Title VII *

USA - January 31 2011
On January 24, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an 8-0 opinion in Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP, Case No. 09-291, holding that Title VII encompasses retaliation taken against a third-party based on the protected activity of another.

Co-authors: Linda M. Jackson .


EEOC’s final GINA regulations to take effect and impact employers *

USA - January 4 2011
On January 10, 2011, the EEOC's final regulations implementing Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 ("GINA") will take effect.

Co-authors: Lesley Pate Marlin.


Next »