We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Alexander J. Kipp Roetzel & Andress

Results 1 to 5 of 9



Ohio Supreme Court rules that a psychiatric condition must “arise from” a claimant’s physical injuries in order to be compensable under Ohio workers’ compensation law *

USA - June 5 2013
On June 4, 2013, the Ohio Supreme Court issued its decision in Armstrong v. Jurgenson, Slip Opinion No. 2013-Ohio-2237. As previously published in…


Ohio Supreme Court to rule on definition of a compensable psychiatric condition under Ohio workers’ compensation law *

USA - May 20 2013
Armstrong v. Jurgenson, Case No. 2012-0244, is currently pending before the Ohio Supreme Court. Oral argument was held January 23, 2013. The case…


Ohio Governor proposes a $1 billion workers’ compensation rebate to public *

USA - May 3 2013
Ohio Governor John Kasich has proposed a one-time dividend of $1 billion (yes, billion with a B) for private and public employers who are…

Co-authors: Eric Bruestle, Christopher R. Debski, Doug Spiker, Douglas M. Kennedy, Nathan Pangrace.


March madness – productivity drain or morale booster? *

USA - March 29 2013
As the 2013 NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament enters its second weekend of competition, many employers are asking themselves: What kind of impact does…


Employers beware – an award of attorney fees and costs to a successful workers’ compensation appellant is not dependent on how many claimed conditions are approved/denied *

USA - January 30 2013
Late last year, in Holmes v. Crawford Machine, Inc., Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-5380, the Ohio Supreme Court held that R.C. 4123.512(F) entitles a…


Next »