We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Rodger L. Eckelberry Baker & Hostetler LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 10



Common and predominating damages: Comcast opinion extends Wal-Mart v. Dukes' standards for class certification but leaves the question of Daubert for another day *

USA - April 2 2013
On March 27, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, Case No. 11-864, which provides a valuable tool for the defense in…

Co-authors: Dustin M. Dow, Casie D. Collignon, Patrick T. Lewis, Danyll W. Foix, John B. Lewis.


Sixth Circuit further defines requirements of commonality under Dukes; distinguishes Seventh Circuit case relaxing those requirements *

USA - February 21 2013
In a recent case, Miller v. Countrywide Bank (In re Countrywide Financial Corp. Mortgage Lending Practices Litigation), — F.3d —, No…

Co-authors: Elizabeth A. Braverman.


Seventh Circuit rejects class trial by [un]representative sample *

USA - February 19 2013
In Espenscheid v. DirectSat USA, LLC, Case No. 12-1943 (7th Cir. Feb. 4, 2013), in a combined collective/class action asserting claims under the Fair…


Dukes dooms Domino’s delivery drivers’ class action *

USA - February 14 2013
The Eighth Circuit recently reaffirmed one of the central holdings of Dukes v. Wal-Mart—commonality is no longer a "rubber stamp." In Luiken v…

Co-authors: Scott J. Bent.


Class action settlements — res judicata or not? *

USA - August 7 2012
Defendants settle class actions, in large part, to buy peace. 

Co-authors: Robert Tucker.


Next »