We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Sam Schwartz-Fenwick Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 19

Same-sex spouse entitled to spousal death benefits *

USA - July 30 2013
Last month, in U.S. v Windsor, the Supreme Court struck down the definition of spouse contained in the Defense of Marriage Act. The Defense of…

Co-authors: Amanda A. Sonneborn .

Seventh Circuit holds that Amara allows recovery of money damages under ERISA Section 502(a)(3) *

USA - June 18 2013
On June 13, 2013, the Seventh Circuit held that the Supreme Court's decision CIGNA Corp. v. Amara authorized an ERISA plaintiff seeking equitable…

Co-authors: Megan E. Troy , Amanda A. Sonneborn .

Conductor and his musicians hit with $14 million in damages for ESOP-related ERISA violations *

USA - June 11 2013
In a recent damages ruling in a complex ESOP case, the Western District of Wisconsin composed a musical metaphor to explain its philosophy on ERISA…

Co-authors: Ian H. Morrison , Christopher Busey.

Seventh Circuit reads plan language to discount plaintiffs’ rate argument *

USA - March 20 2013
Judge Posner of the Seventh Circuit provided a remedial lesson in calculating a present value before getting down to the legal merits in a recent…

Co-authors: Christopher Busey, Brian M. Stolzenbach.

First Circuit declares unconstitutional a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act *

USA - June 7 2012
On May 31, 2012, in Gill, et al., v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Case Nos. 10-2207 & 10-2214, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit unanimously declared unconstitutional Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”).

Co-authors: Ian H. Morrison .

Next »