We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
USA - May 11 2012
Two recent court decisions and a new piece of legislation from Michigan have spurred a ruckus over the relationship between the single-purpose entity (SPE)/separateness covenant on solvency and the typical CMBS non-recourse carve-out guaranty.
