We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Robert S. Sanoff Foley Hoag LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 38



Superfund liability for the repair of a useful product *

USA - May 14 2013
A few months ago, I blogged on the decision in Duke Energy Progress Inc. v. Alcan Aluminum Corporation where a court held that a company would not be…


What response costs are necessary under CERCLA *

USA - April 24 2013
In a post last year, I discussed what I I thought was the dubious dismissal of a CERCLA cost recovery action in Stratford Holding, LLC v. Fog Cap…


PCS Nitrogen Inc. v. Ashley II of Charleston: required reading for superfund lawyers *

USA - April 9 2013
The Fourth Circuit handed down a primer on CERCLA liability last week in PCS Nitrogen Inc. v. Ashley II of Charleston. It should be required reading…


Words matter — settlement agreements should be enforced as written *

USA - April 2 2013
Sometimes you read a decision and it's hard to understand how there really were two plausible sides to the dispute. Arrowood Indemnity Company v The…


CERCLA’s act of war defense — potential collateral damage. *

USA - March 27 2013
For the first time in CERCLA's history, a court has concluded that a Superfund claim was barred by the "act of war" defense. In that case, In Re…


Next »