We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Benjamin E. Shiftan Sedgwick LLP

Results 1 to 2 of 2



Was that really an “accident”?: Northern District of California reiterates what constitutes an “accident” under a commercial general liability policy *

USA - January 14 2013
In Alco Iron & Metal Co. v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co., No. 11-5181 CW, 2012 WL 5878391 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2012), the U.S…


Prospective insureds, do your homework: flood insurer has no duty to provide advice to potential policyholders *

USA - May 22 2012
In Grissom v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., No. 11-60260, 2012 WL 1383069 (5th Cir. Apr. 23, 2012), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overturned a jury verdict in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, holding that under Mississippi law, a purchaser of flood insurance cannot maintain a negligent misrepresentation cause of action against a flood insurer simply because the insurer failed to inform the consumer that he was eligible for a “preferred risk” policy.