We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Erin C. Carroll Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Results 1 to 2 of 2



California employers get a break on meal and rest claims but still face class action filings *

USA - April 18 2012
In a highly anticipated decision, on April 12 the California Supreme Court in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court held that employers are not obligated to ensure that nonexempt employees take their meal breaks.

Co-authors: Darcy L. Muilenburg, Thomas N. Makris, Paula M. Weber, Kathryn A. Nyce.


CA Court of Appeal finds three-arbitrator panel contract provision unenforceable *

USA - September 10 2009
In Parada v. Superior Court, 2009 DJDAR 12745 (August 27, 2009), the Fourth District Court of Appeal held an arbitration clause in contracts between an investment company and its customers requiring a three-arbitrator panel was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable where the company failed to justify it.

Co-authors: Amy L. Pierce, Wesley C. J. Ehlers, Meredith E. Nikkel.