We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Amanda G. Alley Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Results 1 to 4 of 4



Settlement of individual claims did not moot class representative’s appeal in class action *

USA - February 10 2010
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in Narouz v. Charter Communications, LLC, held that a class representative who voluntarily settled his individual claims but retained a “personal stake” in the class representation retained the right to continue in representative capacity and appeal the denial of a motion for class certification.

Co-authors: Amy L. Pierce, Greg L. Johnson.


The $10 limit: court clarifies California’s law on redemption of retail gift cards *

USA - January 25 2010
The federal District Court, Southern District of California, issued the first decisions interpreting Section 1749.5(b) of California’s Gift Card Law since its amendment in 2007 confirming that merchants have the right to refuse to redeem a gift card for cash where the balance is $10 or more.

Co-authors: Amy L. Pierce, Greg L. Johnson, Deborah S. Thoren-Peden.


Contractor must report non-obvious hazards even if it did not create them *

USA - January 19 2010
California’s First District Court of Appeal in Suarez v. Pacific Northstar Mechanical, Inc., found that Cal-OSHA provisions, Labor Code §§ 6304.5 and 6400, “impose a duty on each employer, at a multiemployer worksite, to report all non-obvious hazards about which the employer learns because its employees were exposed to them during the course of their work, even if the employer in question did not create the hazard.”

Co-authors: Amy L. Pierce, Robert A. James, Wesley C. J. Ehlers.


California Attorney General interprets AFSA’s single document rule *

USA - January 13 2010
The California Attorney General recently opined that the single document requirement for automobile sales contracts is satisfied by a document consisting of multiple pages attached to each other and integrated by means such as inclusive sequential page numbering.

Co-authors: Amy L. Pierce, Greg L. Johnson.