We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Kelly O’Ferrall Stikeman Elliott LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 20



Plester v. Polyone Canada Inc. update: serious safety violation is still not cause for termination *

Canada - April 19 2013
In a previous post, we discussed a decision which held that, PolyOne Canada Inc. (PolyOne), did not have just cause for terminating a senior employee…


A friendly reminder to be careful who you "CC", especially when it comes to terminating employees *

Canada - March 19 2013
In a somewhat unique case, the Ontario Superior Court confirmed the principle that, even where a document is prima facie privileged as a…


Martin v. Concreate USL Limited Partnership update: Court of Appeal finds restrictive covenants to be unenforceable *

Canada - February 19 2013
A decision we discussed in a previous post - which held that certain restrictive covenants signed in the context of a sale of business were…


Employment contracts - things to think about in 2013 *

Canada - January 17 2013
In keeping with the New Year's tradition of making resolutions, we suggest that employers, their counsel and human resources personnel add one more…

Co-authors: Kathleen Chevalier.


Serious safety violation not cause for termination *

Canada - November 19 2012
In the 2011 decision of Plester v. Polyone Canada Inc., an Ontario Court held that an employer did not have just cause to terminate a senior employee who committed a serious safety violation and subsequently failed to report it, in violation of company policy.

Co-authors: Mari Maimets.


Next »