We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Steven J Pearlman Proskauer Rose LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 45



C.D. Cal. Greenlights SOX claim, analyzing whether scienter must be shown where violation of internal controls is alleged *

USA - May 7 2013
On April 24, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California issued its final ruling that a SOX whistleblower complaint survived…

Co-authors: Noa M Baddish, Harris Mufson.


New whistleblower bounty law on the horizon in NY? *

USA - April 30 2013
On March 22, 2013, the New York State Senate introduced the S4362 Proposal which, through a "bounty," gives financial awards to whistleblowers who…

Co-authors: Daniel L. Saperstein.


Fifth Circuit: no fee shifting for Title VII mixed-motive retaliation claims *

USA - April 17 2013
On April 3, 2013, the Fifth Circuit affirmed a ruling from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas that a plaintiff was not…

Co-authors: Jonathan S Hershberg, Harris Mufson.


Recent multi-million dollar whistleblower jury awards — a wake-up call for employers *

USA - April 15 2013
In what might be an unsettling trend for employers, juries in Philadelphia and Anchorage have recently issued multi-million dollar jury awards in…

Co-authors: Rachel S Fischer, Harris Mufson, Michael J Graham.


ARB says equitable modification of SOX statute of limitations saves untimely complaint *

USA - April 11 2013
On March 29, 2013, the Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board ("ARB") ruled that a "standstill" agreement between an employer and employee…

Co-authors: Allana Grinshteyn, Harris Mufson.


Next »