We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Kimberly Gosling Morrison & Foerster LLP

Results 1 to 3 of 3



New York court holds that federal standards of care preempt state-law standards governing hiring, training, and retention of pilots *

USA - October 1 2012
A New York state trial court recently added another voice to the chorus of cases finding that federal law preempts state-law standards of care in the field of aviation safety.

Co-authors: Chris Dalton, Don Rushing.


Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp.: duty to warn does not require duty to train users *

USA - July 30 2012
In a recent ruling, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that, under Minnesota negligence law, manufacturers and suppliers have a duty to warn foreseeable users of dangers inherent in the product, and that this duty includes a duty to give adequate instructions on the safe use of the product.

Co-authors: Jessica Moore, Don Rushing.


Beginning today, new removal and venue rules improve defendants’ access to federal courts *

USA - January 6 2012
Today, a number of important but unheralded changes to the landscape of federal jurisdiction take effect.

Co-authors: Erin M. Bosman, Nathan Cooper.