We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Sarah Shody McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 5



U.S. Supreme Court refuses to adopt a bright-line rule on limitation periods for corporate insider profit claims *

Canada, USA - May 3 2012
There is little law in Canada regarding if and how limitation periods applicable to statutory causes of actions in securities legislation can be tolled.


Ontario Court of Appeal puts a strict time limit on secondary market misrepresentation class action *

Canada - March 1 2012
Public issuers in Canada, and their directors and officers, will benefit from a recent ruling of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, which puts a strict time limit on investors seeking to advance a statutory cause of action for allegedly misleading secondary market disclosure.


US Supreme Court limits extraterritorial reach of US securities law: Morrison v. National Australia Bank *

Canada - January 12 2011
Out of the US Supreme Court comes a positive development for Canadian issuers of securities who have business operations in the United States: the US Supreme Court held, on June 24, 2010, that the principal statutory provisions used by security-holders to bring class actions in the US — s.10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 (which is promulgated under s. 10(b)) — have no application to trades in securities that are not traded on a US exchange and that do not take place in the US.

Co-authors: Dana M. Peebles, Benjamin H. Silver.


US Supreme Court limits extraterritorial reach of US securities law: Morrison v. National Australia Bank *

Canada, USA - September 2 2010
Out of the US Supreme Court comes a positive development for Canadian issuers of securities who have business operations in the United States: the US Supreme Court held, on June 24, 2010, that the principal statutory provisions used by security-holders to bring class actions in the US — s.10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 (which is promulgated under s. 10(b)) — have no application to trades in securities that are not traded on a US exchange and that do not take place in the US.

Co-authors: Dana M. Peebles, Benjamin H. Silver.


US Supreme Court limits extraterritorial reach of US Securities Law *

USA - July 22 2010
Out of the US Supreme Court comes a positive development for Canadian issuers of securities who have business operations in the United States: the US Supreme Court held, on June 24, 2010, that the principal statutory provisions used by security-holders to bring class actions in the US — s.10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 (which is promulgated under s. 10(b)) — have no application to trades in securities that are not traded on a US exchange and that do not take place in the US.

Co-authors: Dana M. Peebles, Benjamin H. Silver.