We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Dana M. Peebles McCarthy Tétrault LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 8



Talking to the class — carefully, very carefully *

Canada - August 3 2012
Companies doing business in Canada, and especially franchisors, should review two recent decisions of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice that considered the risks of communications to members of a proposed or certified class: if such communications persuade people not to participate in the lawsuit, courts have to consider whether to step in to protect the class size and cohesion, so that defendants do not weaken the economic viability of, and possibly "dismember," the class action.

Co-authors: Emma Sarkisyan .


US Supreme Court limits extraterritorial reach of US securities law: Morrison v. National Australia Bank *

Canada - January 12 2011
Out of the US Supreme Court comes a positive development for Canadian issuers of securities who have business operations in the United States: the US Supreme Court held, on June 24, 2010, that the principal statutory provisions used by security-holders to bring class actions in the US — s.10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 (which is promulgated under s. 10(b)) — have no application to trades in securities that are not traded on a US exchange and that do not take place in the US.

Co-authors: Benjamin H. Silver, Sarah Shody.


US Supreme Court limits extraterritorial reach of US securities law: Morrison v. National Australia Bank *

Canada, USA - September 2 2010
Out of the US Supreme Court comes a positive development for Canadian issuers of securities who have business operations in the United States: the US Supreme Court held, on June 24, 2010, that the principal statutory provisions used by security-holders to bring class actions in the US — s.10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 (which is promulgated under s. 10(b)) — have no application to trades in securities that are not traded on a US exchange and that do not take place in the US.

Co-authors: Benjamin H. Silver, Sarah Shody.


A decision that rings a Dell *

Canada - August 2 2010
Can consumer and non-consumer contracts that contain an arbitration clause be made subject to class proceedings?

Co-authors: Kara L. Smyth, Shaun Emery Finn, Miranda Lam.


US Supreme Court limits extraterritorial reach of US Securities Law *

USA - July 22 2010
Out of the US Supreme Court comes a positive development for Canadian issuers of securities who have business operations in the United States: the US Supreme Court held, on June 24, 2010, that the principal statutory provisions used by security-holders to bring class actions in the US — s.10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 (which is promulgated under s. 10(b)) — have no application to trades in securities that are not traded on a US exchange and that do not take place in the US.

Co-authors: Benjamin H. Silver, Sarah Shody.


Next »